<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle18
{font-family:Arial;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Whilst agreeing with Ken in principle, the reality is
that some (a few) PDPs are likely to become challenging as the process evolves,
no matter what timelines are initially set. However if we are doing our jobs
properly the number should be few to start with, and also decrease with time as
we gain expertise in setting reasonable timeframes. Therefore I’m
reluctant to take way the ability of council to vote for time extensions, as it
appears an easier process than initiating an entirely new PDP. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>If over the course of time, the number of time
extensions proves to be unacceptably high, then I would support a move remove
the time extension capability.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Tony</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=black face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;
color:windowtext'>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> owner-</span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'>council@gnso.icann.org</span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'> [mailto:owner-</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>council@gnso.icann.org</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b></span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'>Ken Stubbs</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> 04 January 2006 18:09<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> </span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>Marilyn Cade</span></font><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;
color:windowtext'><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> 'Thomas Keller'; '</span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'>Ross Rader</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>'; 'Mawaki Chango'; 'Council GNSO'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [council] Draft Call
for papers, new gTLD PDP</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><b><font size=3 color=black
face=Arial><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold'>I
am becoming a firm believer in the concept of a "drop dead" date for
PDP's. <br>
<br>
I believe that we need to insure against "perpetuity" by providing in
the process a "reasonable" time period <br>
for completion.. If the time period is not met then that specific PDP would
expire and an entirely new PDP would have to be initiated.<br>
<br>
I do not think it is a good idea to allow for council votes for "time
extensions" for a specific PDP as this <br>
would circumvent the concept of a "timely " process..<br>
<br>
your thoughts ?<br>
<br>
<br>
Ken Stubbs</span></font></b><font face=Arial><span style='font-family:Arial'><br>
</span></font><br>
Marilyn Cade wrote: </p>
<pre style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>Tom, my thinking is somewhat aligned with yours, but with some slight</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>variations, but I think that this is very worthwhile to develop as a "straw</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>proposal". As I used to manage policy development, and it involved both</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>internal and external policy, there were timelines "we" could control, and</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>some we could not -- e.g. when a policy was going to morph into a public</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>policy issue, such as "data retention", where governments became involved.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>However, still, there were stages that were within control that could be</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>defined and time frames established and adhered to.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Thanks for your example. Helpful.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Marilyn </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font
size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>-----Original Message-----</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>From: <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> [<a
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] On</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Behalf Of Thomas Keller</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:52 AM</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>To: Ross Rader</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Cc: Mawaki Chango; Council GNSO</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Subject: Re: [council] Draft Call for papers, new gTLD PDP</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Ross,</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>I'm very sympathetic of the idea of moving the PDP out to a seperate</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>document which can be amended more easily as well as I'm sympathethic</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>of the thought of keeping the PDP as narrow in purpose as possible. </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Having said the latter I have to note that if we start to really focus</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>the PDP on policy making only we need to deal with the information</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>gathering and understanding part in a different manner. A manner which</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>does not loose the benefit of the offical character of a formal PDP </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>(it is my experience that a issue only gets "real" attention if there</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>is a decision made at the end) but with more freedom for the council</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>to define timelines for the research part for each issue independently. </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>This could be done by a more project based approach with an PDP at</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>its end. Let me give you a short example:</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>1. The council recognises that IDNs are an important issue</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>2. The council officially announces a timeline and events to take place in </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> this time for research and "understanding" the IDN issue.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>3. 2. can be repeated if needed</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>4. The staff manager produces an issues report on IDNs</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>5. The PDP is invoked</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>6. The PDP must be finished in time with an result</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>I guess the main sense of the last point is to have an defined end point</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>for each discussion. To be able to reach a result the TOR of the PDP</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>must be very minimal and defined very precisely. It would therefore be </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>very likely that we and up with more than one PDP for each issue.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Thats my 2 cents worth on this.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Best,</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>tom</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font
size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Am 03.01.2006 schrieb Ross Rader:</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre>
<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt' type=cite><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Mawaki Chango wrote:</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'> </span></font></pre>
<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt' type=cite><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>OK, now that this is clarified and we seem to agree that we</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>need all those processes, the next question I'm attempted</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>to ask is how do we do that, to "redefine" how we should</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>look at the PDP?</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre></blockquote>
<pre style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>My recommendation is two-fold. First, the amendment to the bylaws </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>should be to move the GNSO PDP to a separate document. This would allow </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>us to modify it in the future without having to amend ICANN's bylaws. </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>The amendment should be constructed so that a majority of the board of </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>directors would have to vote in favor of the amendment (as opposed to </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>the 2/3s required now). Second, we should only be looking to modify the </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>timelines in the PDP right now. There might be additional changes </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>required in the future to streamline or otherwise make the process more </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>efficient, but my preference would be to avoid a wholesale </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>reconstruction of the PDP - we have work that we need to undertake </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>immediately that would benefit from having clarified timelines. Let's </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>make sure that we stay focused on the practical goal of getting better </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>at what we do.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'> </span></font></pre>
<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt' type=cite><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>I have another question, Ross. What do you mean by "our</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>getting our technology acts together process"? As</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>enumerated in your ealier email, I suspect this is</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>something the GNSO Council might be doing as well (maybe as</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>part of the sausage-like PDP), so I guess I need to be able</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>to identify what piece is this one, thanks.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre></blockquote>
<pre style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>I was referring to instances where the technical environment wasn't </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>quite ready for the policy work going on in the GNSO and vice versa, </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>where the policy environment wasn't ready for new technical </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>developments being implemented. For me, this comes down to making sure </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>that we are appropriately informed regarding the capabilities of </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>differing technologies (and often, identifying areas where new </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>technology might be required) prior to conducting a PDP. For instance, </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>the GNSO has very little understanding of the policy implications and </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>new policy requirements presented by the IRIS protocol - or whether or </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>not the protocol is even appropriate for the applications that some </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>would like to embed in ICANN policy. In a perfect world, we would have </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>a clear understanding of these implications before we conducted a PDP. </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>In this world, we need to make sure that this lack of understanding </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>doesn't stand in the way of the PDP and that we rise to a proper level </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>of understanding of the relevant issues in a timely manner.</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>Regards,</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font
size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>-ross</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font
size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre></blockquote>
<pre style='margin-left:36.0pt' wrap=""><font size=2 color=black
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>Gruss,</span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>tom</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'>(__) </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>(OO)_____ </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'>(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!</span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> w w w w </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:
36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2
color=black face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre><pre
style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt'> </span></font></pre></div>
</body>
</html>