<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
span.EmailStyle19
{font-family:Arial;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I think the ISPCP would also be likely to add their
support for this item. Its important we try to nail down a process that
overcomes some of the current shortfalls which impact many registrants.</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Tony</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=black face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;
color:windowtext'>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> owner-</span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'>council@gnso.icann.org</span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'> [mailto:owner-</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>council@gnso.icann.org</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'>] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b></span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;color:windowtext'>Ken Stubbs</span></font><font size=2
color=black face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Tahoma;color:windowtext'><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> 05 March 2006 01:53<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> 'GNSO Council'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [council] Agenda
Request</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face=Arial><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Marilyn's
observations here are quite relevant.. <br>
there has to be basic "enforceable" safeguards built into the process
to deal with inadvertent expirations<br>
and accidental deletions.. <br>
<br>
many companies (large & small) , have invested significant funds &
resources into their respective internet presence and<br>
to think that it could all "evaporate" over a mistake made by someone
in the accounts payable department or a misdirected email (i.e. spam
filtered) is disconcerting to say the least... !<br>
<br>
regards<br>
<br>
ken stubbs<br>
</span></font><br>
Marilyn Cade wrote: </p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas:contacts" name="middlename"><u1:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas:contacts" name="Sn"><u1:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="State"><u1:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="City"><u1:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"></u1:SmartTagType></u1:SmartTagType></u1:SmartTagType></u1:SmartTagType></u1:SmartTagType>I
am interested in this topic. I chaired the Transfers TF, and we dealt with a
variety of topics in that TF… <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>But, the
Redemption Grace Period emerged as a safeguard for registrants. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>In those
days, I worked for AT&T, and they had a portfolio of over 500 names,
including .net; .com; .org; several dozen country codes where they had market
facing presence, and when the “proof of concept” TLDs were
introduced, they also defensively registered in info and .biz in particular. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Managing
the portfolio was part of an assignment to a particular part of the
corporation, but still, it was challenging and not simple to keep track of. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I
registered a name or two that I wanted to use, for organizing ad hoc
coalitions, and managed them myself. And, then, when I left AT&T, I
registered two names, one to use, one to defensively protect my
“name”. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I am now
an “average registrant” -- I need all the safeguards I
can get. My registrar is extremely responsible – wait, BOTH my registrars
are responsible. BOTH of them remind me, and remind me, and REMIND me…
but you know, I travel, I have a 90 year old father and I get distracted…
and I am the CEO of a small business with a lot of other distractions… and
focusing on my domain name doesn’t always rise to the top of my
agenda…. Yet, I depend on it…. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>So, I
need all the safeguards I can get. … </span></font><font size=2
color=navy face=Wingdings><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;
color:navy'>J</span></font><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> within reason. <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I’ll
try not to extrapolate from my own experience and ineptness, but still, I think
about the ‘average’ registrant. … and thus, consensus policy
for RGP seems fully appropriate.<u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Marilyn <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='margin-left:36.0pt;text-align:center'><font
size=3 color=black face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><b><font size=2 color=black
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> <a
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> [<a
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>]
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Sophia B<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Saturday, March 04, 2006
7:16 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <a
href="mailto:ross@tucows.com">ross@tucows.com</a><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> GNSO Council<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [council] Agenda Request</span></font><u1:p></u1:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><u1:p> </u1:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=navy
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>I believe that
the current policy is fine. It gives enough time in any way it is implemented
for registrants to renew. </span></font><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Many
people are irresponsible and that is why they loose their domains. I don't
think giving them more time would change it. </span></font><u1:p></u1:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Choosing
a better registrar that does a good job of protecting them is more important. </span></font><u1:p></u1:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Sophia</span></font><u1:p></u1:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> <u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span class=gmailquote><font
size=3 color=black face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>On
03/03/06, <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Ross Rader </span></b><<a
href="mailto:ross@tucows.com">ross@tucows.com</a>> wrote:</span></font></span><u1:p></u1:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;
margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt;
border-color:-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color rgb(204, 204, 204)'>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Bruce, fellow
Councillors,<br>
<br>
At our next meeting, I would like to propose the initiation of a new<br>
policy development process concerning the Redemption Grace Period and<br>
request that this topic be added to our agenda.<br>
<br>
It has recently come to my attention recently that the current<br>
implementation (detailed at <br>
<a href="http://www.icann.org/bucharest/redemption-topic.htm">http://www.icann.org/bucharest/redemption-topic.htm</a>)
is an optional<br>
registry service which may not be meeting the needs of registrants as<br>
originally envisaged when it was implemented. Recent press reports (see <br>
below) and registrant complaints indicate that names are being lost<br>
despite the implementation of this registry service.<br>
<br>
I have spent a lot of time considering whether or not Council can afford<br>
to take on additional work given our current workload and have come to <br>
the view that because of the widespread support for the Redemption Grace<br>
Period amongst the constituencies (as documented on the ICANN website)<br>
and the pre-existence of strong policy and implementation proposals that <br>
already have consensus support of the stakeholders, we should be able to<br>
confirm the Redemption Grace Period proposals as consensus policy fairly<br>
quickly and without much additional effort or contentious debate. <br>
<br>
Because of the pre-existing consensus on this issue, I will propose to<br>
move this forward without creating a task force per Annex A, Section 8<br>
of the ICANN Bylaws once we have agreed to initiate a PDP and been <br>
provided with an issues report by the staff.<br>
(<a href="http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA-8">http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA-8</a>).
i.e. the fast-track.<br>
<br>
In the very least, creation of an issues report will gather up <br>
substantive data on this subject and allow us to make an informed<br>
decision regarding whether or not circumstances like those detailed<br>
below are widespread enough to justify launching a full-fledged PDP.<br>
<br>
Your consideration of this matter would be extremely appreciated. If you <br>
have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a note (or give me<br>
a ring).<br>
<br>
-ross<br>
<br>
'Drop Catchers' Buy and Sell Web Names Others Let Slip<br>
By DAVID KESMODEL<br>
Wall Street Journal<br>
February 22, 2006; Page B1 <br>
Last month, <st1:City u2:st="on"><st1:place u2:st="on">Chicago</st1:place></st1:City>
real-estate agent Judy Orr discovered that a Web<br>
site she used to showcase area homes had gone off-line. It turned out<br>
she had failed to pay the $9 annual renewal fee for her Web address,<br>
<a href="http://oak-lawn-real-estate.com">oak-lawn-real-estate.com</a>.<br>
<br>
But getting her site back online wasn't as easy as she had hoped:<br>
Another company had snapped up the domain name and wanted nearly $2,500<br>
to return it to her. "I was sick to my stomach," Ms. Orr says. It
took<br>
two years of work to build up the site so it would rank prominently in<br>
Google's search results, and that time "went down the drain," she
says. <br>
<br>
The new owner of the address was Lease Domains Inc., which is run by a<br>
21-year-old graduate student, Anthos Chrysanthou, who works out of his<br>
parents' house in a <st1:City u2:st="on"><st1:place u2:st="on">Chicago</st1:place></st1:City>
suburb. Mr. Chrysanthou says his<br>
two-year-old company owns more than 2,000 domain names, many obtained <br>
through a process called "drop catching" -- snagging names owners
have<br>
let expire, either accidentally or because they no longer want them.<br>
<br>
"I liken the whole situation to tangible real estate," says Mr. <br>
Chrysanthou, who is pursuing his master's in business administration at<br>
<st2:Sn u2:st="on">St.</st2:Sn> <st2:middlename u2:st="on">Xavier</st2:middlename>
<st2:Sn u2:st="on">University</st2:Sn> in <st1:City u2:st="on"><st1:place u2:st="on">Chicago</st1:place></st1:City>.
"If you're not paying your mortgage or<br>
your taxes on it, it's going to get taken away."<br>
<br>
Mr. Chrysanthou is one of hundreds of drop catchers who either resell<br>
names or use them for Web sites loaded with advertisements. (Ms. Orr's<br>
former site now features text ads for real estate.) Many drop catchers<br>
have learned the trade in the past year, seeking a piece of the booming<br>
market for domains spurred by a surge in online advertising. The<br>
practice also has gotten a lift from providers of domain services, such<br>
as SnapNames.com Inc., <a href="http://Pool.com">Pool.com</a> Inc. and
GoDaddy.com Inc., which have<br>
introduced tools aimed at helping people grab expiring domains.<br>
<br>
The services circulate lists each day showing which domains are about to <br>
go up for grabs. Auctions are held for particularly in-demand names, and<br>
prices can go sky-high: <a href="http://A1.com">A1.com</a> sold for $260,250 in
December, after its<br>
previous owner let the registration lapse. <br>
<br>
Drop catching "has pretty much changed completely in a few years'
time,"<br>
says Michael Berkens, who runs MostWantedDomains.com, owner of about<br>
45,000 domains, which range from <a href="http://4nudepictures.com">4nudepictures.com</a>
to <a href="http://401kplans.com">401kplans.com</a>, out<br>
of his <st1:place u2:st="on"><st1:City u2:st="on">Fort Lauderdale</st1:City>, <st1:State u2:st="on">Fla.</st1:State></st1:place>,
home. "There's more people," he says, and<br>
"prices have just escalated."<br>
<br>
DNJournal.com , a publication that tracks the domain industry, reported<br>
2,291 sales of expired domains in auctions last year, with winning bids<br>
totaling a combined $11.5 million. That was up from 885 sales totaling<br>
$4.2 million a year earlier. Auctioneers don't report all deals to <br>
DNJournal, and the site doesn't track deals valued at less than $500.<br>
<br>
Roughly 20,000 expired domain names become available each day, according<br>
to industry executives. While many were consciously discarded by their <br>
owners, others, like Ms. Orr's, are the product of a domain-registration<br>
system that many users don't understand well.<br>
<br>
When a user registers a domain name, it can be reserved for as many as<br>
10 years, typically for $80. But many choose a one-year registration <br>
because it is less expensive, often about $10, and because they may not<br>
want the site for a longer period. At the end of the year, the domain<br>
registrar generally sends renewal notices to the owner, but such<br>
messages can be missed if the owner has changed email addresses in that <br>
time.<br>
<br>
Under rules administered by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names<br>
and Numbers, the group that oversees the assignment of Web addresses,<br>
domain registrars such as GoDaddy and Network Solutions LLC have as many <br>
as 45 days after the expiration date to notify the official domain<br>
registry whether a name is being renewed or deleted. Typically,<br>
registrars have given users a grace period -- sometimes as long as 45<br>
days -- to renew their name. <br>
<br>
If a name is deleted, ICANN guidelines then call for a 30-day<br>
"redemption grace period," during which the original owner can still<br>
claim the name. If there is no claim in the redemption period, the name <br>
is dropped from the registry after a five-day holding period, and anyone<br>
is entitled to seek it.<br>
<br>
For the .com and .net registries, managed by VeriSign Inc., names drop<br>
starting around 2 p.m. Eastern each day, all year long. What follows is <br>
a process that some in the industry call "pounding." As the names
drop,<br>
Internet companies that help users acquire expired names send rapid<br>
computer commands to the registry, seeking to grab the most valuable <br>
names. It is "a mad rush," says Dan Rubin, who runs <a
href="http://justdropped.com">justdropped.com</a>,<br>
which helps people identify and acquire expired domains. Registries for<br>
other domain suffixes drop names at different times of day. <br>
<br>
The drop process underwent a key shift starting in late 2004. That is<br>
when SnapNames started a new service for grabbing domains. The company<br>
has signed exclusive agreements with more than a half-dozen registrars, <br>
including Network Solutions and <a href="http://Moniker.com">Moniker.com</a>,
under which the registrars<br>
transfer expired domains to SnapNames, and SnapNames auctions them off.<br>
That way, names that people are interested in don't go through the <br>
traditional drop process that is open to anyone.<br>
<br>
GoDaddy, the largest domain registrar, has introduced its own auction<br>
service for expired names that were registered with it, as have other<br>
registrars, as they seek a cut of the action for expired names. They <br>
begin auctions for names even before the names have officially expired<br>
but warn auction participants that the original owner could still redeem<br>
the name.<br>
<br>
For domain owners, the new system means names can be grabbed from them <br>
even more quickly than they could before. Instead of going through the<br>
full deletion cycle -- which went as long as 75 days -- names are being<br>
transferred to new owners in 30 to 45 days.<br>
<br>
Paul Twomey, chief executive of ICANN, says some people in the domain <br>
industry recently have raised concerns that the guidelines governing<br>
expired names are "being utilized in ways that were not originally<br>
intended." But Mr. Twomey says no one has proposed a formal change in <br>
policy to address the issue.<br>
<br>
Ms. Orr's name, <a href="http://oak-lawn-real-estate.com">oak-lawn-real-estate.com</a>,
is one of those that was<br>
transferred before going through the full deletion process, says Jay <br>
Westerdal, who runs Name Intelligence Inc., a <st1:place u2:st="on"><st1:City u2:st="on">Bellevue</st1:City>,
<st1:State u2:st="on">Wash.</st1:State></st1:place>, company<br>
that tracks the industry.<br>
<br>
Tim Ruiz, vice president of domain services for GoDaddy, which<br>
transferred the name, says, "We make every attempt to give ample <br>
opportunity for registrants to renew." He says the company gives<br>
registrants 30 days to claim a name after it has expired.<br>
<br>
If a corporation loses a domain name that it believes is copyrighted or<br>
trademarked, it can seek to recover the name by appealing to an <br>
arbitration panel under ICANN's dispute-resolution policy. It also could<br>
take the domain's new owner to court, though that can be more expensive.<br>
<br>
<br>
Ms. Orr says she lost her site's name, which wasn't copyrighted or <br>
trademarked, because she made the mistake of relying on her Web-hosting<br>
company to keep track of her registration. She says she didn't see<br>
renewal notices from GoDaddy because it had an old email address for<br>
her. Ms. Orr plans to use another site -- <a href="http://oak-lawn-il.com">oak-lawn-il.com</a>
-- to replace<br>
the one she lost.<u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><font size=3 color=black
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
<br clear=all>
<br>
-- <br>
Sophia Bekele<br>
Voice/Fax: 925-935-1598 <br>
Mob:925-818-0948<br>
<a href="mailto:sophiabekele@gmail.com">sophiabekele@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="mailto:sbekele@cbsintl.com">sbekele@cbsintl.com</a><br>
SKYPE: skypesoph<br>
<a href="http://www.cbsintl.com">www.cbsintl.com </a><u1:p></u1:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>