<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [council] Proposed Motion for 25 June on GNSO "Improvments"</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>You are correct Avri but some may remember the goal in the plan. Your call.<BR>
<BR>
Chuck<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Avri Doria [<A HREF="mailto:avri@psg.com">mailto:avri@psg.com</A>]<BR>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 02:03 AM Eastern Standard Time<BR>
To: Council GNSO<BR>
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Motion for 25 June on GNSO "Improvments"<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Hi Chuck,<BR>
<BR>
I have no problem adding 'by 27 June' to the end of the last sentence <BR>
as this is the date indicated in the plan, though I thought the last <BR>
sentence had already covered it by stating.<BR>
<BR>
"... request(s) that constituencies and nomcom appointees begin the <BR>
task of naming representatives to<BR>
serve in the two Standing Committees as defined in the Top Level Plan.<BR>
<BR>
Or are you suggesting anther change I am not understanding?<BR>
<BR>
thanks<BR>
<BR>
a.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 22 Jun 2008, at 07:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Avri,<BR>
><BR>
> It looks good to me except it might be helpful to request that <BR>
> constituencies identify one member each foe each of the two steering <BR>
> committees by the Council meeting on 25 June if possible.<BR>
><BR>
> Chuck<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)<BR>
><BR>
> -----Original Message-----<BR>
> From: Avri Doria [<A HREF="mailto:avri@psg.com">mailto:avri@psg.com</A>]<BR>
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 05:27 PM Eastern Standard Time<BR>
> To: Council GNSO<BR>
> Subject: [council] Proposed Motion for 25 June on GNSO <BR>
> "Improvments"<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Hi<BR>
><BR>
> Based on my understanding of the results of today's meeting, I have<BR>
> drafted the following motion.<BR>
><BR>
> thanks<BR>
><BR>
> a.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Motion: Avri Doria<BR>
> Second:<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Whereas it is expected that ICANN Board of Directors will adopt<BR>
> recommendations for GNSO "Improvements" and in response to Board<BR>
> resolution 2008.02.15.03 that directed the ICANN Staff in consultation<BR>
> with GNSO to develop an implementation plan<BR>
><BR>
> And whereas such a plan was developed by the Planning Team composed of<BR>
> staff and GNSO members working jointly and in cooperation,<BR>
><BR>
> Therefore:<BR>
><BR>
> The GSNO Council approves the Framework defined in GNSO Improvements –<BR>
> Top Level Plan of 21 June 2008 prepared by the GNSO Improvements<BR>
> Planning Team as documented in (url) and request that constituencies<BR>
> and nomcom appointees begin the task of naming representatives to<BR>
> serve in the two Standing Committees as defined in the Top Level Plan.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>