<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16788" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=696330919-30122008>The following motion
was tabled in our 18 Dec 08 Council meeting to allow for some wording edits that
a couple people volunteered to submit. This is just a reminder for those
who were planning to suggest edits.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=696330919-30122008></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=696330919-30122008>Chuck</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<H4 id=motion_3_tabled_until_8_january_meeting>Motion 3 (tabled until 8 January
meeting)</H4>
<P>Made by: Chuck Gomes <BR>Seconded: Adrain Kinderis</P>
<P>Whereas both the GNSO and ccNSO are anticipating implementation of processes
to introduce IDN TLDs in 2009,</P>
<P>Resolve</P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>1) the GNSO Council strongly believes that neither the New gTLD
or<BR>ccTLD fast track process should result in IDN TLDs in the root
before<BR>the other unless both the GNSO and ccNSO so agree, and<BR>2) fast
track IDN ccTLDs should not be entered into the root if they do<BR>not have an
enforceable commitment to do the following as gTLDs must<BR>do:
<BLOCKQUOTE>i) follow minimal security and stability requirements, IDN
Guidelines and IDN standards;<BR>ii) pay ICANN fees sufficient to ensure
that IDN ccTLDs are fully self-funding and are not cross-subsidized by other
ICANN activities.</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>