<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [council] MOTION 1 ON gTLD IMPLEMENTATION</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>Sorry for saying this but it feels like we’re going around in circles here.<BR>
<BR>
Anthony’s point about us getting past certain issues after 3 years of work seems extremely pertinent to me.<BR>
<BR>
The new TLD program was presented to the Board by the GNSO Council. Surely the Council can appear united when working to see it implemented, can it not?<BR>
<BR>
Mike just sent an email explaining why he proposed that friendly amendment. What he says makes sense to me. If the wording might offend, then maybe we are better off without it in the motion. The important thing is to get the motion passed IMO.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
Stéphane<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Le 08/01/09 19:34, « Rosette, Kristina » <<a href="krosette@cov.com">krosette@cov.com</a>> a écrit :<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><FONT FACE="Arial">It would be accurate to say "[some/several/most] constituencies within the GNSO wish to minimize any further delays" or, depending on how it looks the vote will go "the GNSO Council wishes to minimize any further delays". It is not, however, accurate to say "the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays". As long as certain constituencies or portions of constituencies believe that further implementation work is necessary and doing that work will result in delay, it's simply not possible to refer to the entire GNSO.<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="100%"> <BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><B>From:</B> <a href="owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Anthony Harris<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:01 PM<BR>
<B>To:</B> Stéphane Van Gelder; <a href="icann@rodenbaugh.com">icann@rodenbaugh.com</a>; 'Council GNSO'<BR>
<B>Subject:</B> Re: [council] MOTION 1 ON gTLD IMPLEMENTATION<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">I fully agree with Stephane, having read all the<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">comments I disagree that comments to the<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">contrary are overwhelming, there are simply<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">repeated expressions from brand interests<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">complaining about the introduction of new <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">TLDs. I thought we were past that discussion<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">after three years of Council work on this<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">new round?<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">Tony Harris<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT></SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
----- Original Message ----- <BR>
<BR>
<B>From:</B> Stéphane Van Gelder <<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>> <BR>
<BR>
<B>To:</B> <a href="icann@rodenbaugh.com">icann@rodenbaugh.com</a> ; 'Council GNSO' <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:council@gnso.icann.org</a>> <BR>
<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:51 PM<BR>
<BR>
<B>Subject:</B> Re: [council] MOTION 1 ON gTLD IMPLEMENTATION<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Mike,<BR>
<BR>
May I suggest that the GNSO’s position should be to request for the planned implementation agenda to be kept on track, which is exactly what that sentence says?<BR>
<BR>
There are also a lot of comments from the community strongly requesting that no further time be lost or, indeed, that the process be sped up.<BR>
<BR>
As the new TLD program stems from the GNSO, it would not seem out of place for the GNSO to strive towards a timely implementation of this program.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
Stéphane Van Gelder<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Le 08/01/09 18:39, « Mike Rodenbaugh » <<a href="icann@rodenbaugh.com">icann@rodenbaugh.com</a>> a écrit :<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT COLOR="#000080"><FONT FACE="Arial">Chuck,<BR>
<BR>
Would you consider it a friendly amendment to remove this language, given the overwhelming public comment to the contrary?<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></FONT></SPAN><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Considerable delays have been incurred in the implementation of new gTLDs and the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays.<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
The BC probably cannot support this motion anyway, but if it passes it would be more palatable to the community without this potentially inflammatory language.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Mike<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial">
</FONT></SPAN>
<P ALIGN=CENTER>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="2" WIDTH="100%"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P>
<SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><B>From:</B> <a href="owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Anthony Harris<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:15 AM<BR>
<B>To:</B> Council GNSO<BR>
<B>Subject:</B> [council] MOTION 1 ON gTLD IMPLEMENTATION<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Arial">I would like to second this motion as presented<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Arial">by Chuck Gomes.<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
</FONT></SPAN><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT FACE="Arial">Tony Harris<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
</FONT></SPAN><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><FONT SIZE="6"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18pt'><B>Motions on gTLD Implementation<BR>
</B></SPAN></FONT><B><FONT SIZE="4"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Motion 1 (tabled until 8 January meeting)<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT SIZE="4"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Made by Chuck Gomes<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Seconded by:<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Whereas:<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Implementation Guideline E states, “The application submission date will be at least four months after the issue of the Request for Proposal and ICANN will promote the opening of the application round.” (See Final Report, Part A, Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains, dated 8 August 2007 at <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm#_Toc43798015">http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm#_Toc43798015</a> ) <BR>
The intent of the GNSO with regard to Guideline E was to attempt to ensure that all potential applicants, including those that have not been active in recent ICANN activities regarding the introduction of new gTLDs, would be informed of the process and have reasonable time to prepare a proposal if they so desire. <BR>
The minimum 4-month period for promoting the opening of the application round is commonly referred to as the ‘Communications Period’. <BR>
Considerable delays have been incurred in the implementation of new gTLDs and the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays. <BR>
It appears evident that a second Draft Applicant Guidebook (RFP) will be posted at some time after the end of the two 45-day public comment periods related to the initial version of the Guidebook (in English and other languages). <BR>
Resolve:<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>The GNSO Council changes Implementation Guideline E to the following: * Best efforts will be made to ensure that the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment at least 14 days before the first international meeting of 2009, to be held in Mexico from March 1 to March 6. * ICANN will initiate the Communications Period at the same time that the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment. * The opening of the initial application round will occur no earlier than four (4) months after the start of the Communications Period and no earlier than 30 days after the posting of the final Applicant Guidebook (RFP). * As applicable, promotions for the opening of the initial application round will include: * Announcement about the public comment period following the posting of the second Draft Applicant Guidebook (RFP) * Information about the steps that will follow the comment period including approval and posting of the final Applicant<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'>Guidebook (RFP) * Estimates of when the initial application round will begin. <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>