<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<title>Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=FR link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Forwarded From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Rosemary <b>To:</b>
Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; Stéphane Van Gelder;
KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>Glen<br>
<br>
I think I have made the right changes - 2am here - would youpost this doc for
me pls?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
Rosemary<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Gomes, Chuck [<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">mailto:cgomes@verisign.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Thu 2/18/2010 1:16 AM<br>
To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; Rosemary Sinclair;
Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga<br>
Subject: RE: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint meeting<br>
<br>
Here's the redline version I sent earlier in the week. If no one objects,
let's post a clean version of this and send it to the Council ASAP.<br>
<br>
Glen - Can you do that? If someone want to make changes, please do
so. I am about to head to the airport so will not be able to do much for
a few hours. Don't wait for me.<br>
<br>
Chuck<br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
From: Gomes, Chuck<br>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010
8:23 AM<br>
To: William Drake; Glen de Saint
Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint
Géry; Cavalli, Olga<br>
Subject: RE: Drafting team to
prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint meeting<br>
<br>
<br>
I proposed a final version and was
waiting for feedback from others on this list. If you are okay with what
I did, please distribute it Bill in Rosemary's absence (she is not available
until Thursday her time). If not, make any changes and send it.<br>
<br>
I am traveling today and will have
limited email access.<br>
<br>
Chuck<br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
From: William Drake [<a
href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch">mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch</a>]<br>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010
6:58 AM<br>
To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint Géry;
Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint Géry;
Cavalli, Olga<br>
Subject: Re: Drafting team to
prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint meeting<br>
<br>
<br>
This is on the agenda for tomorrow's
call, shouldn't we send it to the Council to see prior?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
1. New gTLD Implementation &EOI<br>
Discussion of any specific and
actionable recommendations on, for example:<br>
*any remaining concerns with respect
to geographic & property protections<br>
*the utility of the studies proposed
by the GAC, and the foreseen negative effects if they are not completed
pre-launch<br>
*how categorization could
work[Gomes, Chuck] I know there are some in the GAC, in particular
Bertrand, who still are pushing this, but I don't think it has much of chance
to be considered so I think it would be a poor use of time and could take a lot
of time as well. If they bring it up, we cannot avoid that but I would
not recommend we bring it up.<br>
*desirable fee structures<br>
*desired timeline for the roll out
of new gTLDs<br>
<br>
I was listing topics GAC has raised
as indicators of the pool from which we could draw. Obviously there won't
be able to discuss all of these irrespective of whether there are two topics or
three. In that context, I didn't think it was up to us to judge which we
considered meritorious or likely to go anywhere, as some government might
object to us pruning. But if people think doing so is ok in terms of
sensitivities and optics, fine by me.<br>
<br>
<br>
2. Affirmation of Commitments<br>
Discussion of perspectives on:<br>
*the meaning of public interest in
relation to ICANN's identity and mission<br>
*the operationalization of public
interest standards in relation to the work programs of ICANN's various bodies<br>
*specific accountability and
transparency considerations with respect to GNSO's policy dev process<br>
<br>
3. ICANN in the Wider
International Environment<br>
Discussion of the relationship to
ICANN in general and to GAC policies and principles in particular of:<br>
*the ongoing intergovernmental
discussions (e.g. in the ITU and CSTD[Gomes, Chuck] what is CSTD )<br>
<br>
The UN Commission on Science and
Technology for Development <a
href="http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2696">http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2696</a><br>
<br>
<br>
concerning Enhanced Cooperation on
Globally Applicable Public Policy Principles<br>
*the various other proposals that
have been advanced in the ITU and could be taken up by its October 2010
Plenipotentiary Conference concerning, e.g. the provision of registry services,
the harmonization and coordination of ccTLD policies, internationalized domain
names, the interface between international laws and treaties and Internet
governance, security and stability, dispute resolution, and so on<br>
<br>
<br>
I cut nondiscrimination, that's more
about traffic than ICANN<br>
<br>
Shall we send this to council and
get some feedback?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>