<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD><TITLE>Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint meeting</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16915" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 612.0pt 792.0pt; margin: 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=FR vLink=purple link=blue>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=532044320-18022010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Please do NOT post Glen. I need to get feedback from
Janis before it is finalized.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=532044320-18022010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=532044320-18022010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Chuck</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Glen de Saint
Géry<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:53 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Council
GNSO<BR><B>Subject:</B> [council] FW: Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint
meeting<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0cm; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0cm; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0cm; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<P class=MsoNormal><B><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Forwarded
From:</SPAN></B><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> Rosemary
<B>To:</B> Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry; Stéphane Van
Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint Géry; Cavalli,
Olga<BR><B>Subject:</B> Request to post - GAC/GNSO joint
meeting<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Glen<BR><BR>I
think I have made the right changes - 2am here - would youpost this doc for me
pls?<BR><BR>Cheers<BR><BR>Rosemary<BR><BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: Gomes, Chuck [<A
href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">mailto:cgomes@verisign.com</A>]<BR>Sent: Thu
2/18/2010 1:16 AM<BR>To: Gomes, Chuck; William Drake; Glen de Saint Géry;
Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de Saint
Géry; Cavalli, Olga<BR>Subject: RE: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO
joint meeting<BR><BR>Here's the redline version I sent earlier in the
week. If no one objects, let's post a clean version of this and send it
to the Council ASAP.<BR><BR>Glen - Can you do that? If someone want to
make changes, please do so. I am about to head to the airport so will
not be able to do much for a few hours. Don't wait for
me.<BR><BR>Chuck<BR><BR><BR>________________________________<BR><BR>
From: Gomes, Chuck<BR> Sent:
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:23
AM<BR> To: William Drake; Glen de
Saint Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen
de Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga<BR>
Subject: RE: Drafting team to prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint
meeting<BR> <BR> <BR>
I proposed a final version and was waiting for feedback from others on this
list. If you are okay with what I did, please distribute it Bill in
Rosemary's absence (she is not available until Thursday her time). If
not, make any changes and send
it.<BR> <BR>
I am traveling today and will have limited email
access.<BR> <BR>
Chuck<BR><BR><BR>________________________________<BR><BR>
From: William Drake [<A
href="mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch">mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch</A>]<BR>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010
6:58 AM<BR>
To: Gomes, Chuck; Glen de Saint
Géry; Rosemary Sinclair; Stéphane Van Gelder; KnobenW@telekom.de; Glen de
Saint Géry; Cavalli, Olga<BR>
Subject: Re: Drafting team to
prepare for the GAC/GNSO joint
meeting<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
This is on the agenda for
tomorrow's call, shouldn't we send it to the Council to see
prior?<BR>
<BR><BR>
<BR>
<BR><BR>
1. New gTLD Implementation
&EOI<BR>
Discussion of any specific and
actionable recommendations on, for
example:<BR>
*any remaining concerns with
respect to geographic & property
protections<BR>
*the utility of the studies
proposed by the GAC, and the foreseen negative effects if they are not
completed pre-launch<BR>
*how categorization could
work[Gomes, Chuck] I know there are some in the GAC, in particular
Bertrand, who still are pushing this, but I don't think it has much of chance
to be considered so I think it would be a poor use of time and could take a
lot of time as well. If they bring it up, we cannot avoid that but I
would not recommend we bring it
up.<BR>
*desirable fee
structures<BR>
*desired timeline for the roll out
of new gTLDs<BR><BR>
I was listing topics GAC has raised
as indicators of the pool from which we could draw. Obviously there
won't be able to discuss all of these irrespective of whether there are two
topics or three. In that context, I didn't think it was up to us to
judge which we considered meritorious or likely to go anywhere, as some
government might object to us pruning. But if people think doing so is
ok in terms of sensitivities and optics, fine by
me.<BR><BR><BR>
2. Affirmation of
Commitments<BR>
Discussion of perspectives
on:<BR>
*the meaning of public interest in
relation to ICANN's identity and
mission<BR>
*the operationalization of public
interest standards in relation to the work programs of ICANN's various
bodies<BR>
*specific accountability and
transparency considerations with respect to GNSO's policy dev
process<BR><BR>
3. ICANN in the Wider
International Environment<BR>
Discussion of the relationship to
ICANN in general and to GAC policies and principles in particular
of:<BR>
*the ongoing intergovernmental
discussions (e.g. in the ITU and CSTD[Gomes, Chuck] what is CSTD
)<BR><BR>
The UN Commission on Science and
Technology for Development <A
href="http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2696">http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2696</A><BR>
<BR><BR>
concerning Enhanced Cooperation on
Globally Applicable Public Policy
Principles<BR>
*the various other proposals that
have been advanced in the ITU and could be taken up by its October 2010
Plenipotentiary Conference concerning, e.g. the provision of registry
services, the harmonization and coordination of ccTLD policies,
internationalized domain names, the interface between international laws and
treaties and Internet governance, security and stability, dispute
resolution, and so
on<BR><BR><BR>
I cut nondiscrimination, that's
more about traffic than
ICANN<BR><BR>
Shall we send this to council and
get some
feedback?<BR><BR><BR><BR></SPAN><o:p></o:p></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>