<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16915" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=368451300-09032010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>How much is "some support"?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=368451300-09032010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=368451300-09032010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Chuck</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Tim
Ruiz<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 08, 2010 2:44 PM<BR><B>To:</B> GNSO Council
<BR><B>Subject:</B> [council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team
Re-do...<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">
<DIV>More explicitly, what I'm asking each SG to do during their
deliberations/voting on this is to note all the candidates that have at least
some support from their SG so the option below can be considered by the
Council. <BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Tim </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE id=replyBlockquote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: verdana"
webmail="1">
<DIV id=wmQuoteWrapper>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: AoC
Reveiw Team Re-do...<BR>From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com><BR>Date:
Mon, March 08, 2010 1:36 pm<BR>To: "GNSO Council "
<council@gnso.icann.org><BR><BR>Given what Janis and Peter said during
the AoC Q&A this morning<BR>including the fact that the review team will
be larger than first<BR>proposed, we should re-think our endorsement process
and only be<BR>considering who if any of the twelve we do not endorse and
submit the<BR>rest.<BR><BR>I think this should be kept simple. If any of the
candidates have<BR>endorsement of at least one SG they are included. The
names would be<BR>submitted showing the SG(s) endorsement. This only
slightly changes what<BR>the SG are required to do (reverses it), and
resolves the gender and<BR>geographic issues since it leaves it to Janis and
Peter to sort out.<BR><BR>This also gives the most number of candidates an
opportunity to be<BR>considered and give the GNSO the best shot at being
fully represented on<BR>the RT.<BR><BR><BR>Tim
<BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></SPAN></BODY></HTML>