<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17023" name=GENERATOR><!--[if !mso]>
<STYLE>v\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
o\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
w\:* {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
.shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML)
}
</STYLE>
<![endif]-->
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-believe-normal-left: yes
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-believe-normal-left: yes
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-believe-normal-left: yes
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.EmailStyle19 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
<![if mso 9]>
<style>
p.MsoNormal
{margin-left:3.0pt;}
</style>
<![endif]><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US style="MARGIN: 3pt 3pt 0.75pt" vLink=purple link=blue>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=369501716-08062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Agree w/r/t/ Whois and disagree w/r/t
SSR.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=369501716-08062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=369501716-08062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Don't believe we should be negotiating against ourselves by
agreeing to two. Also, it seems to me that the ramifications of the selectors
rejecting GNSO input as to participant number are potentially significant.
In particular, the irony of doing so while the accountability and transparency
review is underway is pretty amazing. I think that would play pretty well
(against ICANN, that is) in a number of important fora.</FONT></SPAN><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Gomes, Chuck
[mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:33
AM<BR><B>To:</B> KnobenW@telekom.de; Rosette, Kristina;
MWong@piercelaw.edu<BR><B>Cc:</B> council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Subject:</B>
RE: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next
RTs<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">So
far, I think everyone who has commented supports Tim’s suggestion that there
should be four GNSO members on the Whois RT and most seem to support a default
of one rep per SG for all RTs. I personally think that we might maximize
our chances of getting four on the Whois RT if we concede to having two on the
SSR RT and also think that it is fairly easy to make a strong case for
that. <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><U><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">The
Case for Four on the Whois RT<o:p></o:p></SPAN></U></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">Whereas
Internet users across the whole ICANN community are impacted by Whois policy,
I don’t think there is any doubt that GNSO constituents are impacted the
most. It is gTLD registrants whose data is displayed and used. It
is gTLD contracted parties who are required to implement Whois and who best
understand the customer service and operational issues related to Whois
offerings. It is commercial gTLD registrants whose businesses are
affected when IP rights are violated. It is noncommercial users who have
most often pointed out the need for privacy of Whois information and
noncommercial organizations that are impacted in similar ways as commercial
businesses.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">In
addition, because of the GNSO’s long and belabored Whois policy development
history and varied Whois operational offerings, the GNSO has the best source
of Whois experts from various points of view. There is also good
evidence that each SG provides a unique area of expertise and represents
different points of view with regard to Whois policy.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><U><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">The
Case for Two on the SSR RT</SPAN></U><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">I
believe that the SSR RT requires a higher degree of technical expertise than
policy expertise and is less dependent on SG areas of focus. I also
believe that the GNSO community as well as the ICANN community is much more
united in terms of SSR issues and hence representation from different sectors
may not necessarily produce significantly different contributions, especially
when compared to a topic like Whois. Particularly with regard to the
GNSO, if each SG endorses one candidate for the SSR team as proposed, I
suspect that the SSR RT would not be negatively impacted if the Selectors
choose a RrSG candidate over a RySG candidate or a NCSG candidate over a CSG
candidate or any other comparison because all of us will likely be putting
forth strong security experts.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">The
SSR RT may be an area where external experts may be especially helpful.
By having fewer reps from SOs and ACs, space may be available for a few more
experts.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><U><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">My
Conclusion<o:p></o:p></SPAN></U></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">I
suggest that I make the case for four GNSO reps on the Whois RT and agree to
two on the SSR team. This might set a good precedent for asking
for four on the New gTLD RT because that, like Whois, is a big GNSO issue and
one that there are clear variances in points of view from each
SG.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'">Chuck<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: blue 1.5pt solid; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<DIV>
<DIV
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>On
Behalf Of </B>KnobenW@telekom.de<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, June 08, 2010 7:46
AM<BR><B>To:</B> krosette@cov.com; MWong@piercelaw.edu<BR><B>Cc:</B>
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> AW: [council] FW: [soac-discussion]
FW: Communication with ACSO on the next RTs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">agreed!<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN lang=DE
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'">Regards</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> <BR></SPAN><SPAN
lang=DE
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'">Wolf-Ulrich</SPAN><SPAN
lang=DE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in">
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: center"
align=center><SPAN lang=DE
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: 0in"><B><SPAN
lang=DE
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Von:</SPAN></B><SPAN
lang=DE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im
Auftrag von </B>Rosette, Kristina<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Montag, 7. Juni 2010
19:46<BR><B>An:</B> Mary Wong<BR><B>Cc:</B> GNSO Council<BR><B>Betreff:</B>
RE: [council] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next
RTs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">+1<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in"><P
class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: center"
align=center><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
</SPAN></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: 0in"><B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>On
Behalf Of </B>Mary Wong<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 07, 2010 1:43
PM<BR><B>Cc:</B> GNSO Council<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [council] FW:
[soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on the next
RTs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">I agree with
Tim's arguments and suggestion for a response, and in addition support
Bill's suggestion that all RTs start with a default distribution of 1 rep
per SG from the GNSO (with deviations being explained and justified
according to each RT scope/topic).<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Cheers<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Mary<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: purple; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Mary
W S Wong</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Professor of
Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Franklin
Pierce Law Center<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Two White
Street<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Concord, NH
03301<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">USA<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Email: <A
href="mailto:mwong@piercelaw.edu">mwong@piercelaw.edu</A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Phone:
1-603-513-5143<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Webpage: <A
href="http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php</A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Selected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
<A
href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><BR><BR>>>>
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<TABLE class=MsoNormalTable
style="BACKGROUND: #f3f3f3; MARGIN-LEFT: 11.25pt" cellPadding=0
border=0><TBODY>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt">
<DIV
style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 5pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #050505 1pt solid; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<TABLE class=MsoNormalTable style="BACKGROUND: #f3f3f3"
cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">From:
</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">William
Drake
<william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">To:</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">"Tim
Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">CC:</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">"GNSO
Council "
<council@gnso.icann.org><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Date:
</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">6/7/2010
11:05 AM<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Subject:
</SPAN></STRONG><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD>
<TD
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0.75pt; PADDING-LEFT: 0.75pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0.75pt; PADDING-TOP: 0.75pt"
vAlign=top>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">Re:
[council] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on
the next RTs<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: 0in"><BR>Hi<BR><BR>It
would be interesting to hear the rationale for reverting to the
original proposal of tiny unrepresentative RTs. In any event,
I strongly agree with Tim that there really has to be four for
WHOIS, the perspectives of the SGs are just too variable for any two
to represent the others, and the whole process could become a focal
point of controversy. Same goes for the pending RT on
competition and consumer issues. As for security, I agree that
two may be relatively less problematic, but only relatively... it's
more difficult to judge ex ante what level of agreement there is or
isn't here across some SGs on the various issues. <BR><BR>It'd be a
lot easier if they'd just default to four across the board in order
to ensure community representation and diverse skill sets at the
table, rather than turning RT size into a needless source of
angst.<BR><BR>Bill<BR><BR><BR>On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Tim Ruiz
wrote:<BR><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black">>
<BR>> I'm not too concerned about having only two seats on the
Security RT,<BR>> but strongly oppose accepting only two seats on
the Whois. <BR>> <BR>> It is perfectly reasonable to allow one
seat each to the SSAC, GAC, and<BR>> ASO. But I think it's
totally implausible to assume a well represented<BR>> RT with
only two for the GNSO and one each for the ccNSO and the ALAC.
I<BR>> believe we make a very strong statement insisting that
each of those are<BR>> doubled - four for the GNSO (one for each
SG, no less), two each for the<BR>> ccNSO and the ALAC due to the
size of their memberships. That would make<BR>> the RT 14
members, and that is certainly workable and more realistic.<BR>>
<BR>> I realize the ALAC and ccNSO can defend themselves, but
given the<BR>> selectors concerns over the team size I think we
should respond with a<BR>> total picture of what we think the RT
should look like and why.<BR>> <BR>> Tim<BR>> <BR>>
-------- Original Message --------<BR>> Subject: [council] FW:
[soac-discussion] FW: Communication with ACSO on<BR>> the next
RTs<BR>> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com><BR>>
Date: Fri, June 04, 2010 1:44 pm<BR>> To:
<council@gnso.icann.org><BR>> <BR>> Please note what the
AoC Selectors have proposed for the next two RTs. <BR>> Please
provide any comments you have on this list. Time permitting,
we<BR>> will also briefly discuss this in meeting on 10
June.<BR>> <BR>> Chuck<BR>> <BR>> From:
owner-soac-discussion@icann.org<BR>>
[mailto:owner-soac-discussion@icann.org] On Behalf Of Janis
Karklins<BR>> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 1:50 PM<BR>> To:
soac-discussion@icann.org<BR>> Cc: 'Rod Beckstrom'; 'Donna
Austin'; 'Olof Nordling'<BR>> Subject: [soac-discussion] FW:
Communication with ACSO on the next RTs<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> Dear colleagues<BR>> <BR>> On behalf of Selectors I
would like to propose that the size and<BR>> composition of the
two next review teams would be as follows:<BR>>
<BR>>
Security
<BR>> WHOIS<BR>> GAC, including the
Chair
2
1<BR>>
GNSO
2
<BR>> 2<BR>>
ccNSO
2
<BR>> 1<BR>>
ALAC
2
<BR>>
1<BR>>
SSAC
1
<BR>>
1<BR>>
RSSAC
1<BR>>
ASO
1
<BR>>
1<BR>> Independent
expert
1-2
2 (law<BR>> enforcement/privacy experts)<BR>>
CEO
1
<BR>>
1<BR>>
13-14
<BR>>
10<BR>> <BR>> I understand that your initial
suggestions/requests were not fully<BR>> accommodated, but for
the sake of efficiency, credibility of the<BR>> process,
budgetary limitations Selectors have developed this
proposal.<BR>> If we would take into account all wishes, the RT
size would be over 20<BR>> which in Selectors’ view is not
credible option.<BR>> <BR>> I hope that proposal will be
equally unacceptable for everybody. I would<BR>> appreciate your
comments or expression of non-objection in coming week.<BR>> Only
after assessment of the violence of your opposition the
Selectors<BR>> will make their proposal (in present form or
modified) public.<BR>> <BR>> Best regards<BR>> JK<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR><BR>***********************************************************<BR>William
J. Drake<BR>Senior Associate<BR>Centre for International
Governance<BR>Graduate Institute of International and<BR>Development
Studies<BR>Geneva,
Switzerland<BR>william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch<BR>www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html<BR>www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake<BR>***********************************************************<BR><BR><BR></SPAN><o:p></o:p></P></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"><BR><A
href="http://www.piercelaw.edu/"><SPAN style="TEXT-DECORATION: none"><IMG
id=_x0000_i1027 height=32
alt="Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Partnership"
src="cid:XLSQHCMDFOCF.affiliationlogo.jpg" width=32
border=0></SPAN></A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>