<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3676" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; webkit-nbsp-mode: space; webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=266031321-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=266031321-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>1. There is concern to deeper involve the SGs in
establishing the process</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=266031321-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>2. Fixing it that way seems to be too early since
we</FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=266031321-10062010><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>'re still in a learning process.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Regards</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN
lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> William Drake
[mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch] <BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Donnerstag,
10. Juni 2010 23:03<BR><B>An:</B> Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich<BR><B>Cc:</B>
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B> Re: [council] Motion on AoC;
amendment<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>hi
<DIV><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>> wrote:</DIV><BR
class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Suggestion for amendment:</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>The 2nd "Resolved" should read:</FONT> <FONT
face="Times New Roman">Resolved further, that the GNSO Council should
implement the Endorsement Process for<STRIKE> all future AOC review team
selections, including</STRIKE> the “WHOIS Policy” and the “Security,
Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS” Review
Teams;</FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>this was the the agreed objective of
the DT for months...could you clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it?
how might we make it different it we did?</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>