<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17023" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Bill,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>apologies. didn't see your message during the call.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>#2: yes</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>#3: Understood. To the IPC, however, having a
slightly more complicated process at the SG level is far preferable to having
the Council take on an SG role and make nominations independent of the
community. If that's absolutely necessary, the circumstances under which
the Council can do so should, in the IPC's view, be narrow, specifically
delineated, and of "a last resort" nature. That's what the proposed amendments
are intended to do.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=925032922-10062010><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>K</FONT></SPAN>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> William Drake
[mailto:william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, June 10,
2010 5:01 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Rosette, Kristina<BR><B>Cc:</B>
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [council]
Changes<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:41 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:</DIV><BR
class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Proposed changes.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>1. Add after the first sentence in point
4: If the list meets the above-mentioned diversity objectives, the
Council will consider the list of endorsements to be deemed final forwarded
to ICANN.</FONT></P>
<DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>Sure, parallel restatement<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>2. Change the now-third sentence of point 4
to read: If, however, . . . … </FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR></DIV>so just add however, ja?<BR>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>3. Change third bullet of #2 to read:
Each stakeholder group is encouraged to (a) identify in its internal
deliberations and (b) notify Council of one or two additional candidates
whom it could support, if available, in the event that the diversity
procedure outlined in item 4 below is utilized.
</FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR></DIV>This would mean that the council is engaging in a compulsory
weeding of any sized pool down to 4-8 "backups" who may or may not help us
meet the diversity requirement. More work for everyone in order to
preclude a council decision by 60% of both houses. The DT was trying to
simplify rather than complicate the process.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Would help to hear how more people feel about this, if they do<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>4. Change the now-third sentence of point 4
to read: If, however, the list does not meet the above mentioned diversity
objectives, the Council as a whole may choose to endorse up to two
additional candidates, from among those identified by the stakeholder groups
under item 2, who would help to give the list of GNSO nominees the desired
balance. If consideration of these additional stakeholder
group-identified candidates does not meet the diversity objectives, the
Council may refer to the GNSO applicant pool to identify these additional
candidates.</FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=Apple-style-span
style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: medium Arial; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; orphans: 2; widows: 2; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><SPAN
class=Apple-style-span
style="WORD-SPACING: 0px; FONT: medium Arial; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; orphans: 2; widows: 2; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">
<DIV
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"><BR></DIV></SPAN></SPAN></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>