<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I disagree. The discussion isn't on whether we end the WG or not. I was reacting to Wolf's proposed change indicating that the WG was to submit a final report by a set date, something which the WG has not confirmed to us.</div><div><br></div><div>The only formal communication we have from them is that they haven't reached consensus.</div><div><br>Stéphane Van Gelder<div>Directeur général / General manager</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://INDOM.com">INDOM.com</a> Noms de domaine / Domain names</div><div><br></div><div>Sent from my iPad</div></div><div><br>Le 30 sept. 2010 à 19:35, <a href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com">tim@godaddy.com</a> a écrit :<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>I think we (the Council) have enough to go on to make a decision about it. The very fact that they are submitting a "final" report tells us that we either need to reconstitute this PDP under a new charter or end it all together. This is our call at this point, not the WGs.<br><br>Tim<br><hr><div><b>From: </b> Stéphane Van Gelder <<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>>
</div><div><b>Sender: </b> <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:32:38 +0200</div><div><b>To: </b><<a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</a>></div><div><b>Cc: </b><<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>>; <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>></div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: AW: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG</div><div><br></div>I don't agree with your change Wolf unless it is confirmed by the WG chairs.<div><br></div><div>My understanding is the same as Chucks: they are currently in discussion with the group on next steps and nothing has been decided yet.</div><div><br></div><div>Stéphane<br>
<br><div><div>Le 30 sept. 2010 à 15:19, <<a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de"><a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</a></a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="255041513-30092010"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">I've inserted an amendment in the "Whereas..." which
reflects the co-chairs' response - as mentioned in my E-Mail earlier today and
would be glad you accept this as friendly.</font></span></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font><br><span lang="de"><font face="Courier New" size="2">Best regards</font></span> <br><span lang="de"><font face="Courier New" size="2">Wolf-Ulrich</font></span></div><br>
<blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" lang="de" dir="ltr" align="left">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>Von:</b> <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"><a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a></a>
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Gomes,
Chuck<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 14:37<br><b>An:</b>
Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO<br><b>Betreff:</b> [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG
<br></font><br></div>
<div></div><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri" color="#1f497d">I am accepting one of Adrian</font></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri" color="#1f497d">’</font></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri" color="#1f497d">s suggested amendments to this motion as friendly
and change it as highlighted in the attached file. Other suggested
amendments are welcome</font></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri" color="#1f497d">. Note also that a second is
needed.</font></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri" color="#1f497d">Chuck</font></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Arial" color="#000000" size="2">
<<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>>
</font></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span></p><div><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div>
<ul dir="ltr">
<ul dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">_____________________________________________<br></font></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">From:</font></b></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> Gomes, Chuck<br></font></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">Sent:</font></b></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53
PM<br></font></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">To:</font></b></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> Council
GNSO<br></font></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b></b></span><span lang="en-us"><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">Subject:</font></b></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"></span><span lang="en-us"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> Motion re. VI
WG </font></span></p><div><span lang="en-us"></span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri"> << File: Motion
- VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >> </font></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">In response to the Board
retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet the 8-day advance
requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and would appreciate
a second. Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies to
determine support for the motion on 7 October.</font></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">I am not opposed to other
ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a motion is a clear way to
kick it off.</font></span></p><p dir="ltr"><span lang="en-us"><font face="Calibri">Chuck</font></span></p></ul></ul></blockquote></div>
<span><Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10 -WUK amend.doc></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>