<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Good catch Wolf.<div><br></div><div>I see no problem in accepting the amendment as friendly.</div><div><br></div><div>I am more perplexed at the references to the DOI that were still in the document you edited.</div><div><br></div><div>Ray, Philip, could you please enlighten us as to whether those were just overlooked or whether the GCOT and the OSC planned to leave them in there?</div><div><br></div><div>As a reminder, the aim of my motion is to completely remove the DOI obligations from the Op Procs as discussed.</div><div><br></div><div>Stéphane<br>
<br><div><div>Le 16 nov. 2010 à 11:39, <<a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</a>> <<a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><p><font size="2" face="Arial">Colleagues,</font>
</p><p><font size="2" face="Arial">The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see </font><a href="https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions"><u><font color="#0000FF" size="2" face="Arial">https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions</font></u></a><font size="2" face="Arial">) reads:</font>
</p><p> <font face="Times New Roman">RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum.</font></p><p><font size="2" face="Arial">I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the proposed revisions to section 5.0<u> in the version presented.</u> To my knowledge the OSC approval was given<u> including</u> the DOI. In this case I'd like to suggest a friendly amendment as follows:</font></p><p> <font face="Times New Roman">RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables<strike> submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC</strike> and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum</font></p><p><font size="2" face="Arial">Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful.</font>
</p><p><font size="2" face="Arial">There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed (see attached).</font>
</p>
<br>
<br><p><font size="2" face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich Knoben </font>
</p><p><font face="Arial" size="2" color="#000000"> <<GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc>> </font>
</p>
</div>
<span><GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc></span></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>