<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6049" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=162321515-21012011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>+1</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Wolf-Ulrich
</FONT></SPAN></P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Tim
Ruiz<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Freitag, 21. Januar 2011 15:28<BR><B>An:</B>
stephane.vangelder@indom.com<BR><B>Cc:</B> Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au;
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B> RE: [council]
JAS<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>I agree with both ideas.<BR><BR>Tim<BR><BR>> -------- Original
Message --------<BR>> Subject: [council] JAS<BR>> From: Stéphane Van
Gelder<STEPHANE.VANGELDER@INDOM.COM><BR>> Date: Fri, January 21, 2011 6:06
am<BR>> To: GNSO Council <COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG><BR>> Cc: Bruce Tonkin
<BRUCE.TONKIN@MELBOURNEIT.COM.AU><BR>> <BR>> Councillors,<BR>>
<BR>> Bruce and I have been discussing the JAS situation off list and he
has a suggestion on another possible way forward we might consider. I would
like to make it clear this is being presented in both Bruce and myself's
personal capacity. This is just us brainstorming the issue, not suggesting
ways forward as Board member and GNSO Chair.<BR>> <BR>> One thing the
GNSO could look at is asking the JAS WG to work on topics of mutual interest
or common ground as defined in the GNSO motion. ALAC could take items that are
in addition back for their own internal discussion. They could then look at
providing advice to the Board directly.<BR>> <BR>> As far as we are
concerned, even though this is a CWG, it is still up to us as the GNSO to
endorse those items we agree with and formally provide our recommendation to
the Board.<BR>> <BR>> Also, to avoid confusion between use of the term
working group within the GNSO procedures, maybe the joint SO/AC groups could
be called "discussion forums".<BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>>
Stéphane<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>