<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6058" name=GENERATOR><!-- converted from rtf -->
<STYLE>.EmailQuote {
PADDING-LEFT: 4pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 1pt; BORDER-LEFT: #800000 2px solid
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=774031416-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Thanks as well Kristina</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Rosette,
Kristina<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Mittwoch, 9. März 2011 16:09<BR><B>An:</B>
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B> RE: [council] Contingent RAA Motion
<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=383500615-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Wolf, </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=383500615-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=383500615-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Yes, technically. As a practical matter,
though, I suppose whether an amendment is an improvement depends on the
amendment and your perspective on it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=383500615-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=383500615-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>K </FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> KnobenW@telekom.de
[mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:11
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Rosette, Kristina;
council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> AW: [council] Contingent RAA
Motion <BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=109150410-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Kristina and Mary,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=109150410-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=109150410-09032011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>just for my understanding since I haven't been deeply
involved in the matter: "improvements" or "amendments" to the RAA means the
same item?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN>
</P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Rosette,
Kristina<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Mittwoch, 9. März 2011 03:38<BR><B>An:</B>
'council@gnso.icann.org'<BR><B>Betreff:</B> [council] Contingent RAA
Motion <BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif" size=2>
<DIV>All,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would like to propose an RAA motion that recommends that Staff
adopt an amended version of the process specified as Process B in the
Final Report on Proposals for Improvements to the Registrar Accreditation
Agreement. Process B was proposed by the Registrar Stakeholder Group
members of the Drafting Team. I am hopeful that the amended process
("Process B+") is an acceptable compromise. As you will see from the
final Whereas clause, this motion is contingent on the failure of the
motion Mary has just introduced (and that I have seconded), and will be
voted upon only if that motion fails.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Safe travels to San Francisco.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>K</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-*-</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Motion to Approve an Amended
Recommendation in the Final Report on Proposals for Improvements to the
Registrar Accreditation Agreement.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas, on 4 March 2009, the GNSO
Council approved the form of the 2009 Registrar Accreditation Agreement
(RAA) developed as a result of a lengthy consultative process initiated by
ICANN;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas, in addition to approving the
2009 RAA, on 4 March 2009 the GNSO Council convened a joint drafting team
with members of the At-Large Community, to conduct further work related to
improvements to the RAA; specifically to: (a) draft a charter identifying
registrant rights and responsibilities; and (b) develop a specific process
to identify additional potential amendments to the RAA on which further
action may be desirable;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas, on 18 October 2010, the Joint
GNSO/ALAC RAA Drafting Team published its Final Report describing specific
recommendations and proposals to the GNSO Council for improvements to the
RAA;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 18pt"><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas,
the GNSO Council has reviewed the Final Report and, in its resolution
20110113-2, the GNSO Council approved of the Form of Registrant Rights and
Responsibilities Charter as described in Annex D of the Final Report and
recommended that Staff commence the consultation process with Registrars
in the RAA to finalize the Registrant Rights and Responsibilities Charter
for posting on the websites of Registrars as specified in Section 3.15 of
the RAA;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas, a GNSO Council motion
recommending that Staff adopt the process specified as Process A in the
Final Report to develop a new form of RAA with respect to the High and
Medium Priority topics described in the Final Report did not
pass;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">Whereas, the GNSO Council desires to
approve an amended version of the process specified as Process B in the
Final Report to develop a new form of RAA with respect to the High and
Medium Priority topics described in the Final Report.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"><BR>RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council
recommends that Staff adopt an amended version of the process specified as
Process B in the Final Report to develop a new form of RAA with respect to
the High and Medium Priority topics described in the Final Report.
As amended herein, Process B entails:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">1. The prioritized list of topics as
set forth in the Final Report is sent to the GNSO Council and ICANN Staff
for identification of any topics that would require consensus policy
development rather than RAA contract amendment. This step shall be
completed not later than sixty (60) days after the date of this
resolution. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">2. ICANN Staff will schedule a public
consultation, to be held at the first ICANN public meeting that occurs
after completion of the review in Step 1, to provide members of the ICANN
community with the opportunity to articulate their support of and/or
objection to the High and Medium Priority topics described in the Final
Report.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">3. Within thirty (30) days after
the public consultation described in Step 2, negotiations begin with the
Negotiating Group consisting of ICANN Staff and the Registrar Stakeholder
Group (as a whole).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">4. The Negotiating Group shall
provide, for public comment, written reports monthly on the status and
progress of the negotiations. Such reports shall include proposed
text under consideration and identify items and text agreed upon by the
Negotiating Group. The monthly report shall identify (a) topics
identified in the Final Report as High or Medium Priority and that were
not determined in Step 1 as requiring consensus policy development; and
(b) proposed amendments put forth by any Stakeholder Group, Constituency,
and/or Advisory Committee (collectively, the “Rejected Topics and
Amendments”), if any, that have been rejected by the Negotiating Group.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">5. The Negotiating Group reviews
public comments received and continues negotiations as necessary. Steps 4
and 5 shall repeat as necessary; provided, however, that the full final
draft of the new RAA must be posted for public comment not later than
September 17, 2012. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">6. Subject to the date
requirement in Step 5, ICANN Staff and the Registrar Stakeholder Group
shall determine when the full final draft of the new RAA is ready to be
posted for public comment. The full final draft of the new RAA that
is posted for public comment shall be accompanied by a detailed written
explanation, approved by both Staff and the Registrar Stakeholder Group,
that sets forth the basis for the rejection of all Rejected Topics and
Amendments.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">7. The GNSO Council shall review
the full final draft of the new RAA, consider public comments, and vote on
approval of the draft new RAA. A Supermajority vote of the GNSO Council is
required to approve the new RAA. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">8. If the GNSO Council approves
the new RAA, the new RAA goes to Board for approval.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">9. If the GNSO Council does not
approve the new RAA, the new RAA is sent back to the Negotiating Group
with appropriate feedback for reconsideration. Repeat from step
7.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif">RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO
Council recommends that this process be initiated by ICANN
immediately.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial, sans-serif" color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>