<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6082" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=715035513-19052011><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>vote for B.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><FONT face=arial
color=#000000>Kind regards<BR>Wolf-Ulrich </FONT></P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>Rafik
Dammak<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2011 12:40<BR><B>An:</B>
William Drake<BR><B>Cc:</B> GNSO Council List<BR><B>Betreff:</B> Re: [council]
Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone
Report<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>hard choice but definitely vote for A ;)
<DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Regards</DIV>
<DIV><BR clear=all>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV>Rafik</DIV></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>2011/5/19 William Drake <SPAN dir=ltr><<A
href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</A>></SPAN><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">And here's one for A
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bill
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=h5><BR>
<DIV></DIV><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>On May 19, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:</DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>and
another one. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>K</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A> [mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A>] <B>On Behalf Of </B><A
href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com"
target=_blank>john@crediblecontext.com</A><BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May
17, 2011 1:22 PM<BR><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com"
target=_blank>stephane.vangelder@indom.com</A><BR><B>Cc:</B> <A
href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com" target=_blank>tim@godaddy.com</A>; <A
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A>; <A
href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>council@gnso.icann.org</A>; <A
href="mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us"
target=_blank>Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us</A><BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>One more vote for B<BR><BR>Berard<BR><BR>> --------
Original Message --------<BR>> Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement
of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant<BR>> Support Second Milestone
Report<BR>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<BR>> Date: Tue, May 17,
2011 9:23 am<BR>> To: "Neuman, Jeff" <BR>> Cc: "<A
href="mailto:'tim@godaddy.com" target=_blank>'tim@godaddy.com</A>'" ,
<BR>> "<A href="mailto:'owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>'owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A>'" , <BR>> "<A
href="mailto:'council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>'council@gnso.icann.org</A>'" <BR>> <BR>> So that's
one vote for version B, right?<BR>> <BR>> Stéphane<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Le 17 mai 2011 à 17:54,
Neuman, Jeff a écrit :<BR>> <BR>> Unfortunately, I cannot commit
on behalf of the rysg to that last sentence on "observance" and would
prefer its deletion since on our last rysg call questions were raised
and I am not sure it adds to the substance of the note.<BR>> <BR>>
Thanks. <BR>> <BR>> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.<BR>> <BR>> Vice
President, Law & Policy<BR>> <BR>> NeuStar, Inc.<BR>>
<BR>> <A href="mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.biz"
target=_blank>Jeff.Neuman@neustar.biz</A><BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder
[mailto:<A href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com"
target=_blank>stephane.vangelder@indom.com</A>]<BR>> <BR>> Sent:
Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:43 AM<BR>> To: <A
href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com" target=_blank>tim@godaddy.com</A> <BR>>
<BR>> Cc: <A href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A> ; Council GNSO <BR>>
<BR>> Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint
Applicant Support Second Milestone Report<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> Thanks Tim, Jeff, Mary and Alan,<BR>>
<BR>> This would be the proposed message then. Either (I call this
version A):<BR>> <BR>> Dear Peter,<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New
gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report.
As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council
notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the
Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating
to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and
recommendations as soon as possible. <BR>> <BR>> The GNSO
Council would also like to inform the Board that it
appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the GNSO-chartering
process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO
for review.<BR>> <BR>> I would be grateful if you could
convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> Best regards,<BR>> Stephane van
Gelder<BR>> GNSO Council Chair<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Or (this my
version B):<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Dear Peter,<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the
Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second
Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG,
the GNSO Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We
acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including
issues relating to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with
our advice and recommendations as soon as possible. <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO
Council's message to the Board.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
Best regards,<BR>> Stephane van Gelder<BR>> GNSO Council
Chair<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> As Olga had requested a vote, I
would like to suggest that we give ourselves until Thursday's meeting to
vote by return email to the list on either version A or B, and whichever
has the most votes is the one I send.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Is that
acceptable to everyone?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> Stéphane<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> Le 17 mai 2011 à 14:12, <A
href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com" target=_blank>tim@godaddy.com</A> a écrit
:<BR>> No objection if you remove the last sentence. There is no
chartering process for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO could not even agree on
what the charter should be. And at least a few of us have concerns about
how and why CWGs are being formed.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Tim<BR>>
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <BR>> <BR>> Sender: <A
href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org</A><BR>> <BR>> Date:
Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21 +0200<BR>> To: Council GNSO<BR>>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report<BR>> <BR>> Councillors,<BR>>
<BR>> Please find below the NCSG's suggestion on a message which I
could send to the Chairman of the Board in my capacity as Chair of the
GNSO.<BR>> <BR>> Thanks Mary for providing this draft.<BR>>
<BR>> Please let me have your comments.<BR>> <BR>>
Stéphane<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Le 14 mai
2011 à 16:31, a écrit :<BR>> <BR>> Hi - sorry for the delay in
getting back to you on the Council letter; there has been some lively
discussion among some NCSG folks about it.<BR>> <BR>> We
suggest the following draft:<BR>> <BR>> Dear Peter,<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the
Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS
WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of
the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has not yet approved the
Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward with new
gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to
provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as
possible. <BR>> <BR>> The GNSO Council would also like to
inform the Board that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous
observance of the chartering process, in submitting its Report
simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review. <BR>> <BR>>
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to
the Board.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Best
regards,<BR>> Stephane van Gelder<BR>> <BR>> Cheers<BR>>
Mary<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Mary W S
Wong<BR>> Professor of Law<BR>> Chair, Graduate IP
Programs<BR>> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP<BR>>
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW<BR>> Two White
Street<BR>> Concord, NH 03301<BR>> USA<BR>> Email: <A
href="mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu"
target=_blank>mary.wong@law.unh.edu</A><BR>> Phone:
1-603-513-5143<BR>> Webpage: <A
href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php"
target=_blank>http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</A><BR>>
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: <A href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584"
target=_blank>http://ssrn.com/author=437584</A>>>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
From: <BR>> Stéphane Van Gelder<BR>> <BR>> To:<BR>> Olivier
MJ Crepin-Leblond , Council GNSO <BR>> <BR>> Date: <BR>>
5/14/2011 5:18 AM<BR>> <BR>> Subject: <BR>> [council] Re:
Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone
ReportThanks Olivier.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> GNSO Council,
FYI.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> A good weekend to all.<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> Stéphane<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Le 14 mai
2011 à 11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> Dear Stéphane,<BR>> <BR>> please find enclosed, a copy of
our follow-up message to the Board including ALAC comments.<BR>>
Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any query about its
contents.<BR>> Have a good week-end!<BR>> Kind regards,<BR>>
<BR>> Olivier<BR>> <BR>> -------- Message original
--------<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Sujet:<BR>> Statement of
the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report<BR>>
<BR>> Date :<BR>> Fri, 13 May 2011 20:26:34 -0700<BR>>
<BR>> De :<BR>> ICANN At-Large Staff <BR>> <BR>>
Pour :<BR>> Secretary <BR>> <BR>> Copie
à :<BR>> <A href="mailto:ocl@gih.com"
target=_blank>ocl@gih.com</A> , <A
href="mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com"
target=_blank>carlton.samuels@gmail.com</A> , <A
href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com"
target=_blank>rafik.dammak@gmail.com</A> , ICANN At-Large
Staff<BR>> <BR>> Dear all, <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> The
At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):<BR>> <BR>> The Second
Milestone Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working
Group ( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction (entitled
�Status of this Document�); and<BR>> The Statement of the ALAC on the
Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report. <BR>>
<BR>> We request that these documents (attached here) be forwarded to
the members of the ICANN Board. <BR>> <BR>> The
Second Milestone Report was received by the ALAC and the Generic Names
Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 7 May 2011. Then, the
At-Large staff, on behalf of the ALAC, initially forwarded this Report
to the Board on 9 May 2011. Please note that the Report
itself has not been substantively changed since the Board initially
received it on 9 May.<BR>> <BR>> During the period 7�13 May,
comments on the Report were collected from the At-Large
Community. These comments are the basis for the Statement of
the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report attached
here.<BR>> <BR>> The ALAC ratification process for the Second
Milestone Report and the ALAC Statement will begin on 14 May, and the
results will be forwarded to the Board.<BR>>
<BR>>
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted
independently and has not reached the approval stage. <BR>>
<BR>> Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt
Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon<BR>> ICANN
At-Large Staff<BR>> <BR>> email: staff[at]<A
href="http://atlarge.icann.org"
target=_blank>atlarge.icann.org</A><BR>> website: <A
href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org"
target=_blank>www.atlarge.icann.org</A><BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>