<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">And here's one for A<div><br></div><div>Bill<br><div>
</div>
<br><div><div>On May 19, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="645171603-19052011"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">and another one. </font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="645171603-19052011"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="645171603-19052011"><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">K</font></span></div><br>
<blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" lang="en-us" dir="ltr" align="left">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of
</b><a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a><br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:22
PM<br><b>To:</b> stephane.vangelder@indom.com<br><b>Cc:</b> tim@godaddy.com;
owner-council@gnso.icann.org; council@gnso.icann.org;
Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [council] Re: Statement of the
ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone
Report<br></font><br></div>
<div></div>One more vote for B<br><br>Berard<br><br>> -------- Original
Message --------<br>> Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on
the Joint Applicant<br>> Support Second Milestone Report<br>> From:
Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com><br>> Date: Tue, May 17,
2011 9:23 am<br>> To: "Neuman, Jeff" <jeff.neuman@neustar.us><br>> Cc:
"<a href="mailto:'tim@godaddy.com">'tim@godaddy.com</a>'" <tim@godaddy.com>, <br>>
"<a href="mailto:'owner-council@gnso.icann.org">'owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>'" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org>, <br>>
"<a href="mailto:'council@gnso.icann.org">'council@gnso.icann.org</a>'" <council@gnso.icann.org><br>> <br>> So that's
one vote for version B, right?<br>> <br>> Stéphane<br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Le 17 mai 2011 à 17:54, Neuman, Jeff a
écrit :<br>> <br>> Unfortunately, I cannot commit on behalf of the rysg
to that last sentence on "observance" and would prefer its deletion since on
our last rysg call questions were raised and I am not sure it adds to the
substance of the note.<br>> <br>> Thanks. <br>> <br>> Jeffrey J.
Neuman, Esq.<br>> <br>> Vice President, Law & Policy<br>>
<br>> NeuStar, Inc.<br>> <br>> <a href="mailto:Jeff.Neuman@neustar.biz">Jeff.Neuman@neustar.biz</a><br>>
<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: Stéphane Van
Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com]<br>> <br>> Sent: Tuesday,
May 17, 2011 11:43 AM<br>> To: <a href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com">tim@godaddy.com</a> <br>> <br>> Cc:
<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> ; Council GNSO <br>> <br>> Subject: Re:
[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second
Milestone Report<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Thanks Tim, Jeff,
Mary and Alan,<br>> <br>> This would be the proposed message then.
Either (I call this version A):<br>> <br>> Dear Peter,<br>> <br>>
<br>> We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint
SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone
Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council
notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's
desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant
support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as
soon as possible. <br>> <br>> The GNSO Council would also
like to inform the Board that it appreciates the JAS WG's
scrupulous observance of the GNSO-chartering process, in submitting its Report
simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review.<br>> <br>> I would
be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the
Board.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Best regards,<br>> Stephane
van Gelder<br>> GNSO Council Chair<br>> <br>> <br>> Or (this my
version B):<br>> <br>> <br>> Dear Peter,<br>> <br>>
<br>> We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint
SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone
Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council
notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's
desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant
support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as
soon as possible. <br>> <br>> <br>> I would be grateful if
you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.<br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> Best regards,<br>> Stephane van Gelder<br>> GNSO
Council Chair<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> As Olga had requested a vote,
I would like to suggest that we give ourselves until Thursday's meeting to
vote by return email to the list on either version A or B, and whichever has
the most votes is the one I send.<br>> <br>> <br>> Is that acceptable
to everyone?<br>> <br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> <br>> <br>>
Stéphane<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Le 17
mai 2011 à 14:12, <a href="mailto:tim@godaddy.com">tim@godaddy.com</a> a écrit :<br>> No objection if you remove
the last sentence. There is no chartering process for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO
could not even agree on what the charter should be. And at least a few of us
have concerns about how and why CWGs are being formed.<br>> <br>>
<br>> Tim<br>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <br>> <br>> Sender:
<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a><br>> <br>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21
+0200<br>> To: Council GNSO<br>> Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of
the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report<br>>
<br>> Councillors,<br>> <br>> Please find below the NCSG's suggestion
on a message which I could send to the Chairman of the Board in my capacity as
Chair of the GNSO.<br>> <br>> Thanks Mary for providing this
draft.<br>> <br>> Please let me have your comments.<br>> <br>>
Stéphane<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Le 14 mai 2011 à
16:31, a écrit :<br>> <br>> Hi - sorry for the delay in getting back to
you on the Council letter; there has been some lively discussion among some
NCSG folks about it.<br>> <br>> We suggest the following
draft:<br>> <br>> Dear Peter,<br>> <br>> <br>> We
understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the
other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it
has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move
forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and
hope to provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as
possible. <br>> <br>> The GNSO Council would also like to inform
the Board that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of
the chartering process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and
the GNSO for review. <br>> <br>> I would be grateful if you could
convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.<br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> Best regards,<br>> Stephane van Gelder<br>> <br>>
Cheers<br>> Mary<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Mary W S
Wong<br>> Professor of Law<br>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs<br>>
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP<br>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SCHOOL OF LAW<br>> Two White Street<br>> Concord, NH 03301<br>>
USA<br>> Email: <a href="mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu">mary.wong@law.unh.edu</a><br>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143<br>>
Webpage: <a href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</a><br>> Selected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
<a href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</a>>>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: <br>> Stéphane Van
Gelder<br>> <br>> To:<br>> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond , Council GNSO
<br>> <br>> Date: <br>> 5/14/2011 5:18 AM<br>> <br>> Subject:
<br>> [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone ReportThanks Olivier.<br>> <br>> <br>> GNSO Council,
FYI.<br>> <br>> <br>> A good weekend to all.<br>> <br>>
<br>> Stéphane<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Le 14 mai 2011 à
11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :<br>> <br>> <br>> Dear
Stéphane,<br>> <br>> please find enclosed, a copy of our follow-up
message to the Board including ALAC comments.<br>> Please don't hesitate to
get in touch if you have any query about its contents.<br>> Have a good
week-end!<br>> Kind regards,<br>> <br>> Olivier<br>> <br>>
-------- Message original --------<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>
Sujet:<br>> Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second
Milestone Report<br>> <br>> Date :<br>> Fri, 13 May 2011
20:26:34 -0700<br>> <br>> De :<br>> ICANN At-Large
Staff <br>> <br>> Pour :<br>> Secretary <br>>
<br>> Copie à :<br>>
<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com">ocl@gih.com</a> , <a href="mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com">carlton.samuels@gmail.com</a> , <a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a> ,
ICANN At-Large Staff<br>> <br>> Dear all, <br>> <br>>
<br>> The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of
the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):<br>> <br>> The Second Milestone
Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group
( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction (entitled �Status of
this Document�); and<br>> The Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report. <br>> <br>> We request that
these documents (attached here) be forwarded to the members of the ICANN
Board. <br>> <br>> The Second Milestone Report was
received by the ALAC and the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO)
on 7 May 2011. Then, the At-Large staff, on behalf of the
ALAC, initially forwarded this Report to the Board on 9 May
2011. Please note that the Report itself has not been substantively
changed since the Board initially received it on 9 May.<br>> <br>>
During the period 7�13 May, comments on the Report were collected from the
At-Large Community. These comments are the basis for the Statement
of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report attached
here.<br>> <br>> The ALAC ratification process for the Second
Milestone Report and the ALAC Statement will begin on 14 May, and the results
will be forwarded to the Board.<br>>
<br>>
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted
independently and has not reached the approval stage. <br>> <br>>
Regards,<br>> <br>> Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella
Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon<br>> ICANN At-Large Staff<br>>
<br>> email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org<br>>
website: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br><br></council@gnso.icann.org></owner-council@gnso.icann.org></tim@godaddy.com></jeff.neuman@neustar.us></stephane.vangelder@indom.com></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>