<div dir="ltr">Hi Wolf-Ulrich,<div><br></div><div>sorry for delay, as I replied in adobeconnect chat during the council call, we are going to send you WG responses on your questions.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>
<br clear="all"><div dir="ltr"><div>Rafik</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote">2011/5/20 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">Rafik,</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">Eric B,-W. has once sent me an answer to Q.
3.2.</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">As all questions from Stéphane as well as the RySG have
been answered - can I also expect answer to my other
questions?</font></span></div>
<div> </div>
<p style="margin-top:0px;font-size:10pt;margin-bottom:0px"><font face="Arial"><span>Thanks and ki</span>nd
regards<br>Wolf-Ulrich</font></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;font-size:8pt;margin-bottom:0px"> </p>
<div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font> </div><br>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="margin-right:0px">
<div lang="de" dir="ltr" align="left">
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>Von:</b> Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich <br><b>Gesendet:</b>
Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2011 13:59<br><b>An:</b> 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; Rafik
Dammak; Carlton Samuels<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
GNSO<br><b>Betreff:</b> AW: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS
CWG<br></font><br></div><div class="im">
<div></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">All,</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">I'd like to add some more to Stéphane´s questions
(according to the report structure):</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">3. Qualification of applicants: I've some doubt's an
applicant's self declaration might be sufficient. At least appropriate
references should be provided.</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">3.1.2 under-served language: similar to Stéphane, what
are the criteria to define these communities (number of
members...)</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">3.1.3 emerging markets - poor regions: in the note to
3.1.5 reference should be made to the existing (and to the potential lack of)
technical infrastructure</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
</div><div class="im"><div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">3.2 Financial need: How is the contribution of 45,000 $
calculated? Is this just 25% of the regular application
fee?</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
</div><div class="im"><div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">4.1 Financial support/relief: shpuld this be on top of
3.2?</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">4.1.3 Refund from auction proceeds: does this mean
"auction profit"?</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">4.4 Development fund: I've concern that this should be
under the direction of applicants meeting the support criteria only. At least
representatives of the "ICANN community" as well from the ICANN executive
management should be part of the directive body.</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">4.5 The function of an "External funding agency" is not
clear to me.</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2">I hope for clarification and fruitful discussion on the
topics.</font></span></div>
<div><font face="Arial" color="#0000ff" size="2"></font> </div>
<p style="margin-top:0px;font-size:10pt;margin-bottom:0px"><font face="arial" color="#000000">Kind regards<br>Wolf-Ulrich </font></p><br>
</div><blockquote dir="ltr" style="margin-right:0px">
<div lang="de" dir="ltr" align="left">
<hr>
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><div class="im"><b>Von:</b> <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Stéphane Van
Gelder<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 12:35<br><b>An:</b> Rafik
Dammak; Carlton Samuels<br></div><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
GNSO<br><b>Betreff:</b> [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS
CWG<br></font><br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div></div>Hi Rafik, Carlton,
<div><br></div>
<div>Having read the JAS WG report, I want to congratulate you and the group
on the impressive amount of work that has been achieved.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I have several questions which I thought I'd put to the list so that
they might benefit any discussion we might have on this during our next
Council meeting. These are to help my personal understanding of the report
and what the group is recommending.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>On page 3, it says that the group is responding to requests from its
charters and the Board and the GAC. Should we understand by this statement
that the group has been taking input directly from the Board and the GAC, on
top of its chartering organisations?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>On page 4 it says "This WG is comprised of members who support these
aims and are committed to lowering the barriers to full participation in the
gTLD program by a truly global and inclusive community." As co-chairs, do
you feel the group's membership was representative of a sufficiently
diverse set of views, opinions and approaches?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Page 6 says that one criteria for eligibility is "Service in an
under‐served language, the presence of which on the Internet has been
limited". This is further explained in 3.1.2. But I don't understand what
the metrics for these criteria are? What makes a language under-served and
how can we measure if its presence on the Internet is limited?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Page 9, section 3.3 goes back to my earlier question about where and
from whom the group has been getting input. Here it says that the group had
agreed on one set of recommendations (govs not entitled to support) but are
now working to change those after the GAC has asked them to. Do you, as
co-chairs, feel comfortable with this?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Page 12, section 4.2 Do you not feel the deferment of DNSSEC is not in
keeping with ICANN's mission of ensuring a stable and secure Internet? As
DNSSEC is such a clear security feature, would it not be better to seek
(financial) support for applicants that find the cost of implementing it too
high, rather than suggesting they need not implement it upon start-up (with
the risk that it may then be years before they actually do implement
it)?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>On the same section, what does the group mean by "relaxed VI rules" in
the light of the latest Board resolution on VI?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Thanks for any help or any answers you can provide and once again, I
would like to thank you for the hard work you have both put in to this
group.</div>
<div> <br>
<div>
<div>Stéphane</div>
<div><br></div><br></div><br>
<div>
<div>Le 8 mai 2011 à 01:51, Rafik Dammak a écrit :</div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hello ,
<div><br></div>
<div>I am sending the link to the second milestone report for the JAS WG
to our respective chartering organizations: GNSO and ALAC for
consideration and endorsement in order to show the progress
done there acknowledging that we need to do more.</div>
<div><a href="https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations</a></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>@Stephane I am going to submit a motion in due time to be voted in
the next GNSO council confcall and we are going to make update for
GNSO council.</div>
<div>Thank you,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Best Regards,</div>
<div><br clear="all">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Rafik </div></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>