<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.6082" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Segoe UI">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358051409-18062011><FONT face="Segoe UI">1.
See my insertion. I think "needy applicants" is to be seen in a wider range - as
referenced in the JAS report, too.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358051409-18062011></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=358051409-18062011><FONT face="Segoe UI">2.
The term "and on behalf of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups" means
(time-eating) co-ordination</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"><FONT
face=arial>Kind regards<BR>Wolf-Ulrich </FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px"> </P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=de dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von
</B>Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Samstag, 18. Juni 2011
10:58<BR><B>An:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org<BR><B>Cc:</B> 'GNSO Council
List'<BR><B>Betreff:</B> RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>How about -</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the
Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). We unanimously, and on behalf
of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups, believe that it is important
for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of
the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which
will assist potential needy applicants <SPAN
class=358051409-18062011><FONT face="Segoe UI">[WUK: ] - inter
alia </FONT></SPAN>from developing regions of the world<SPAN
class=358051409-18062011><FONT face="Segoe UI">[WUK: ]
- </FONT></SPAN> participate in the first round of the new gTLD program
as fully as possible. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS
WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports,
and look forward to receiving its Final Report so that recommendations for
ensuring equal access to the new gTLD program can be discussed and
implemented." </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would suggest that, if we can, a statement such as this (tweaked as
necessary) be issued to the community (including the Board and the GAC) as
soon as possible :)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Cheers</DIV>
<DIV>Mary<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#800080>Mary W S Wong</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><EM>Professor of Law</EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM>Chair, Graduate IP Programs</EM></DIV>
<DIV><EM>Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP</EM></DIV>
<ADDRESS>UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Two White Street</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Concord, NH 03301</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>USA</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Email: <A
href="mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu">mary.wong@law.unh.edu</A></ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Phone: 1-603-513-5143</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Webpage: <A
href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</A></ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Selected writings available on the Social Science Research
Network (SSRN) at: <A
href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</A></ADDRESS>>>>
</DIV>
<TABLE style="FONT-SIZE: 1em; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 15px" bgColor=#f3f3f3
border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV style="PADDING-LEFT: 7px; BORDER-LEFT: #050505 1px solid">
<TABLE style="FONT: 9pt Segoe UI" bgColor=#f3f3f3>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>From: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@unsw.edu.au></TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>To:</STRONG></TD>
<TD>Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au>,
"tim@godaddy.com" <tim@godaddy.com>, Stéphane Van
Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>,
"owner-council@gnso.icann.org"
<owner-council@gnso.icann.org>, "Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu"
<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu></TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>CC:</STRONG></TD>
<TD>"'GNSO Council List'" <council@gnso.icann.org></TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>Date: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>6/18/2011 4:48 AM</TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>Subject: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Or that
using a CWG when we do not have clear, agreed processes made progress on
an issue where there was common commitment to doing "something" much
more difficult for the WG members and the Council<BR><BR>Given that we
now have a unanimous position supporting the group's work I think Mary's
original proposal was very useful as it took the content out of play and
left our ongoing discussion to focus on process management issues....in
this case implementation proposals rather than policy
proposals....<BR><BR>I'd support Mary's original
version<BR><BR>Cheers<BR><BR>Rosemary<BR>________________________________________<BR>From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of
Adrian Kinderis [adrian@ausregistry.com.au]<BR>Sent: Saturday, June 18,
2011 5:48 PM<BR>To: tim@godaddy.com; Stéphane Van Gelder;
owner-council@gnso.icann.org; Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu<BR>Cc: 'GNSO Council
List'<BR>Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's
gameplan<BR><BR>+1<BR><BR>Adrian Kinderis<BR><BR><BR>From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of tim@godaddy.com<BR>Sent: Saturday, 18 June 2011 3:48 PM<BR>To:
Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council@gnso.icann.org;
Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu<BR>Cc: 'GNSO Council List'<BR>Subject: Re:
[council] Adrian's gameplan<BR><BR>And that a cwg or jwg may not have
been the appropriate mechanism for the
issue.<BR><BR>Tim<BR>________________________________<BR>From: Stéphane
Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com><BR>Sender:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org<BR>Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:09:47
+0200<BR>To: <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu><BR>Cc: 'GNSO Council
List'<council@gnso.icann.org><BR>Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's
gameplan<BR><BR>Thanks Mary,<BR><BR>Would you be up for drafting a
proposed statement, for the Council's
consideration?<BR><BR>Stéphane<BR><BR><BR><BR>Le 18 juin 2011 à 09:01,
<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu<mailto:Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>> a
écrit :<BR><BR><BR>In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible
deliverables and courses of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made
during today's discussion, viz., that the GNSO Council consider
circulating a brief statement to the ICANN community, stating its
support for the work being done by the JAS WG and reiterating the
importance of the issues they are considering.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Mary W
S Wong<BR>Professor of Law<BR>Chair, Graduate IP Programs<BR>Director,
Franklin Pierce Center for IP<BR>UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF
LAW<BR>Two White Street<BR>Concord, NH 03301<BR>USA<BR>Email:
mary.wong@law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu><BR>Phone:
1-603-513-5143<BR>Webpage: <A
href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</A><BR>Selected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: <A
href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</A><BR>>>><BR>From:<BR><BR>"Andrei
Kolesnikov"
<andrei@cctld.ru<mailto:andrei@cctld.ru>><BR><BR>To:<BR><BR>"'Adrian
Kinderis'"
<adrian@ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian@ausregistry.com.au>>,
"'GNSO Council List'"
<council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>><BR><BR>Date:<BR><BR>6/18/2011
1:13 AM<BR><BR>Subject:<BR><BR>RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan<BR><BR>I
think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial.
Or there will be always a workaround for "endless
discussion".<BR><BR>--andrei<BR><BR>From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
Kinderis<BR>Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM<BR>To: GNSO Council
List<BR>Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan<BR><BR>As I discussed in
the Working Session today.<BR><BR>The four issues based on this
discussion (as I see
them);<BR><BR>-
Stephane speaking directly to the
Board<BR>- Katim’s
email and the issues of the JAS WG<BR>o Processes within the
Council<BR>- The
future of Cross Community Working Groups<BR>o Publishing of
reports etc<BR>-
The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal
processes and representation<BR>o Multi stakeholder make
up<BR>o Differing views/ differing<BR><BR>It would be best,
I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of action in order
to promote resolution.<BR><BR>Adrian
Kinderis<BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>