<html>
<body>
I'm not one to defend the Board, but Senegal has been one of the more
stable and calm countries in Africa. That has unfortunately changed for
the worst in recent weeks.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 21/07/2011 07:06 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">[...]<br>
But why ICANN continually chooses places that forces key stakeholders and
contributors to not be able to participate to the fullest.<br>
<br>
Crazy.<br>
<br>
Here’s an idea. Let’s build a remote site and EVERYONE go
there...<br>
<br>
LA Marriott anyone?<br>
<br>
<b>Adrian Kinderis</b><br><br>
<br>
<b>From:</b> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org" eudora="autourl">
mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Tim
Ruiz<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 21 July 2011 3:24 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> council@gnso.icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [council] Remote Participation for Senegal<br>
<br>
Glen,<br><br>
Can you provide an update of on the expected availability of remote<br>
participation for Senegal?<br><br>
Also to all, if there is any movement toward a US or EU remote<br>
participation base, I would be up for that and doing what I could to<br>
help cover costs. I think John was asking about this earlier. Any<br>
interests?<br><br>
Either way, after further consideration I think I may be attending
only<br>
remotely.<br><br>
<br>
Tim<br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>