<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from rtf -->
<style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<font face="Times New Roman, serif" size="3">
<div>Dear Councilors,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As discussed during the SCI update to the GNSO Council in Prague, the SCI has now approved the proposed procedure for a consent agenda as well as an updated version of the voting matrix which incorporates the new voting thresholds resulting from the recently
approved revised GNSO PDP. Both these documents are intended to modify the GNSO Operating Procedures. <b>The SCI hereby submits these documents for your consideration, approval and sending out for public comment period of 21 days</b>. A respective motion is
attached if needed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As also discussed during the Prague meeting, the SCI would like to obtain clarification from the GNSO Council on how to handle public input on these proposed changes in future. ICANN Staff has indicated that according to the ICANN Bylaws at a minimum a
public comment period of 21 days should be conducted on any changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures. From the SCI's perspective, there are two possible options the GNSO Council may want to consider: </div>
<ol style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; ">
<li>The SCI puts out the proposed changes out for public comment, following which the SCI reviews the public comments received and updates the proposed changes, if deemed appropriate. The updated proposed changes, in addition to the report of public comments
received are then submitted to the GNSO Council for consideration. </li><li>The SCI submits the proposed changes to the GNSO Council, following which the GNSO Council opens a public comment forum on the proposed changes. Once the public comment forum closes, the GNSO Council decides how to address any comments received, which may
include referring the comments back to the SCI for consideration and possible updates to the proposed changes.</li></ol>
<div> </div>
<div>From the SCI's perspective, its members are happy to follow either procedure (or alternative the GNSO Council may want to propose), so that it is clear what the required steps are for any future proposed changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures the SCI
may propose.</div>
<div>With best regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Courier New, monospace" size="2">Wolf-Ulrich Knoben </font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New, monospace" size="2"> </font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New, monospace" size="2"> </font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New, monospace" size="2"> </font></div>
</font>
</body>
</html>