<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jul 1, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div>Wrap-up and brain storming discussion</div><div>Do we want to start the ICANN meeting week with a similar, open ended discussion, as the one we have during the wrap-up on Thursday?</div></span></blockquote></div><br><div>As mentioned I think the insertion of some Barcamp/unconference-like time into the agenda would benefit ICANN generally, not just GNSO, although this would probably require reinstating at least Friday morning to allow the regular meetings to get done. In the meanwhile though, yes starting the Council's week this way would be refreshing.</div><div><br></div><div>Bill</div></body></html>