<html>
<body>
For those who may not have noticed it, the original message includes a
reference to a Webinar TOMORROW (Wednesday) at 1500 UTC. It is not in the
GNSO Calendar.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 01/10/2012 11:14 AM, john@crediblecontext.com wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Stephane,<br><br>
I am in agreement with you.<br><br>
It is neither realistic nor necessary for there to be a Council statement
as long as we "work with our respective groups."<br><br>
Cheers,<br><br>
John Berard<br>
Founder<br>
Credible Context<br>
58 West Portal Avenue, #291<br>
San Francisco, CA 94127<br>
m: 415.845.4388<br><br>
<dl>
<dd>-------- Original Message --------<br>
<dd>Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion<br>
<dd>From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder
<<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">
stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>><br>
<dd>Date: Mon, October 01, 2012 8:04 am<br>
<dd>To: "Jonathan Robinson"
<<a href="mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com">
jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com</a>><br>
<dd>Cc:
<<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
><br><br>
<dd>Councillors,<br><br>
<dd>FYI I have not engaged with Olof directly to ascertain what has led
him to believe that the Council could put together a statement in this
short space of time, on something that has taken months of previous GNSO
work to put <a href="http://together.So">together.So</a> I do not know if
it is realistic to expect the Council to submit statements.<br><br>
<dd>We have, over the past weeks, seen some pointed questions for Staff
from Councillors on the latest implementation plans for the URS. Kurt has
given some responses and I understand that the Toronto session Olof
refers to is also part of Staff's work to get a complete picture of the
situation and ensure a proper way forward is found.<br><br>
<dd>This is one of the outcomes we had in mind when URS was put on our
weekend agenda, and Wolf and Glen are working with Kurt to organize that
session. I think Kurt's proposed approach to have the output of the
Toronto meetings inform further GNSO discussions is useful, and would
encourage us all to work with our respective groups to ensure that the
Council does feed those discussions.<br><br>
<dd>Thanks,<br><br>
<dd>Stéphane<br><br>
<br><br>
<dd>Le 1 oct. 2012 à 16:47, Jonathan Robinson a écrit :<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dd>Thanks Stéphane,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I can confirm that the Registries SG has now received a related
request from ICANN (Olof Nordling) looking for input and agenda
items.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>In our case, we (the GNSO) are being asked for a presentation or
statement on the way forward for URS work. <br>
<dd>It seems that Olof is looking for something at the Monday
meeting.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>As far as I can see this topic (URS) only comes up on the weekend as
part of our composite new gTLD session with the Kurt on Sunday
morning.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>So, we may need to schedule some dedicated time to deal with this or
set Olof’s expectations that a statement is unlikely.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I’d be interested to hear from others as to whether or not it’s
realistic to provide GNSO Council agreed input at the Monday
meeting?<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Jonathan<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>From:</b>
<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">
owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">
mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of </b>Stéphane Van
Gelder<br>
<dd>Sent:</b> 29 September 2012 13:14<br>
<dd>To:</b>
<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
List<br>
<dd>Subject:</b> [council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Councillors, FYI.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Stéphane Van Gelder<br>
<dd>Directeur Général / General manager<br>
<dd>INDOM NetNames France<br>
<dd>----------------<br>
<dd>Registry Relations and Strategy Director<br>
<dd>NetNames<br>
<dd>T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51<br>
<dd>F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Début du message réexpédié :<br><br>
<br>
<dd>De : </b>Olof Nordling
<<a href="mailto:olof.nordling@icann.org">olof.nordling@icann.org</a>
><br>
<dd>Objet : RE: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion<br>
<dd>Date : </b>28 septembre 2012 18:08:48 HAEC<br>
<dd>À : </b>'Stéphane Van Gelder'
(<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">
stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>)
<<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">
stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>><br>
<dd>Cc : </b>Kurt Pritz
<<a href="mailto:kurt.pritz@icann.org">kurt.pritz@icann.org</a>>,
Karen Lentz
<<a href="mailto:karen.lentz@icann.org">karen.lentz@icann.org</a>>,
Amy Stathos
<<a href="mailto:amy.stathos@icann.org">amy.stathos@icann.org</a>
><br><br>
<br>
<dd>Dear Stéphane,<br>
<dd>Kurt forwarded me your kind reply to his mail below, and I would like
to follow-up with some updates and a specific question. As you may have
noted, the first upcoming sessions on URS are a webinar on 3 October
(see<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-6-24sep12-en.htm">
http</a>
<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-6-24sep12-en.htm">
://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-6-24sep12-en.htm</a>
) and a session in Toronto on 18 October (see
<a href="http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34325">
http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34325</a>), where we will further discuss
the solution suggestions brought up by the community in Prague and pursue
the objectives stated in Kurt’s mail. The ambition is to find an
agreed way to analyze each suggestion in detail and reach balanced
conclusions, for example by establishing a suitably balanced drafting
team for that purpose.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Now to my question, as you mention that the Council may follow-up on
Kurt’s message in a near future: Could we count on a presentation or
statement at the URS session in Toronto to provide GNSO Council guidance
on the best way forward for the continued URS work?<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I hope this is possible and look forward to your response.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>On another note: I also intend to contact the GNSO SGs/Constituencies
individually as their contributions to the discussions in substance are
essential. In addition, your help in spreading the word to them would be
much appreciated. Proposals for the Toronto session as to speakers and
topics are warmly welcome, as well as written input.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Very best regards<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Olof<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>From: </b>Stéphane Van Gelder
<<a href="mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com">
stephane.vangelder@indom.com</a>><br>
<dd>To: </b>Kurt
<<a href="mailto:kurt.pritz@icann.org">kurt.pritz@icann.org</a>><br>
<dd>Cc: </b>GNSO Council List
<<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>
><br>
<dd>Subject: </b>Re: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Thanks Kurt. I am copying the Council for their information.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>The Council will no doubt follow-up on this in the near future.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Best,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Stéphane Van Gelder<br>
<dd>Directeur Général / General manager<br>
<dd>INDOM NetNames France<br>
<dd>----------------<br>
<dd>Registry Relations and Strategy Director<br>
<dd>NetNames<br>
<dd>T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51<br>
<dd>F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Le 18 sept. 2012 à 22:09, Kurt Pritz a écrit :<br><br>
<br><br>
<dd>Hi Stephane:<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I am writing to let you know that we are planning a set of
discussions on Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) implementation in the near
future and seek the input of GNSO leadership. As you know, a meeting in
Prague we indicated that URS, as currently designed, did not appear to
meet cost requirements. In Prague, contributors in the meeting described
briefly several potential solutions. In the next set of meetings, we want
to flesh out some of those models for possible implementation.We want to
have one meeting in about two weeks (probably a webinar type of format
with a possibility for some face-to-face interaction), and then we have a
meeting in Toronto is scheduled. The first meeting will be announced
shortly.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I am writing you because some of the proposed solutions, while
feasible, do not match up with the specific conclusions of the STI team
when it did its work. We recognize the role of the GNSO in those
discussions. While the meetings we are having are open to all, we
understand that the GNSO leadership might want to conduct the URS
discussions in a certain way. Having the twin goals of developing a
solution in time for use by new gTLDs and ensuring that all those
interested can participate in the discussion, we can work in whichever
way the GNSO wishes to proceed. (Of course, we also seek to meet the cost
and timeliness goals for which the the URS was designed and also seek to
ensure that registrants enjoy the protections written into the current
model by the IRT and STI.)The output of the next meetings can inform GNSO
discussion or we can carry on in a way acceptable to the GNSO.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I am also copying Olivier as ALAC members participated in the
STI.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I hope you find this helpful. Contact me anytime with questions.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Regards,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Kurt<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> </blockquote>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>