<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19328"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>So</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>- add the matrix including commentzs</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>- use the "SG" abbreviation in the right context only
(Stakeholder Group)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>- leve the text just with Stakeholder Groups / Constituencies
(no numbers!)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Also I think the breakdown of a small group of 5 people in
percentages is questionnable to reflect community views.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=002063014-16102012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>In total I think the matrix is selfdescribing where we are,
and the board should be marure enough to interprete it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich
</FONT></SPAN></P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=de class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] <B>Im Auftrag von </B>William
Drake<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 08:38<BR><B>An:</B> Alan
Greenberg<BR><B>Cc:</B> Winterfeldt, Brian;
'council@gnso.icann.org'<BR><B>Betreff:</B> Re: [council] Draft Letter from
GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>+1 on Alan's remarks, particularly the first one. I think the
explanatory notes would be helpful.
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Best,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bill<BR>
<DIV></DIV><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:17 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:</DIV><BR
class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>Brian, several comments:<BR><BR>- does this imply that you will not be
sending any of the detailed breakdowns by SG/Const, including the
explanatory notes that <BR><BR>- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it
normally stands for Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context. <BR><BR>-
Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of the SG
without any information about its constitution is not very
informative.<BR><BR>- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is
unclear, as the GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder
Groups, and two Stakeholder Groups without
constituencies.<BR><BR>Alan<BR><BR>At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt,
Brian wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite=x-msg://31/ type="cite">Dear
Councilors,<BR> <BR>As was discussed in Saturday‚s session with
regard to the WHOIS RT work, attached please find a draft letter to the
ICANN Board detailing our various constituencies‚ recommendations as to
whether a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS
enhancements.<BR> <BR>We appreciate your prompt attention to this
matter and look forward to hearing your views so that we may move forward
as soon as possible with providing our communication to the Board.
Thank you.<BR> <BR>Best
regards,<BR> <BR>Brian<BR> <BR><B>Brian J. Winterfeldt
</B></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>