<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Yes, and the 'summit' naming has generated some heat on some other fora, so it isn't a matter of naming only - summit implies a high level intergovernmental event to some. <div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>David</div><div><br><div><div>On 16 Nov 2013, at 6:01 pm, Magaly Pazello <<a href="mailto:magaly.pazello@gmail.com">magaly.pazello@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Hi John!<br>Brazilian gov is not calling "summit" the meeting next year the oficial name is Multstakholder Conference on the Future of Internet Governance.<br>Magaly<br><br>On Saturday, November 16, 2013, John Berard <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> What do governments and I-stars mean by "accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA"?<br>><br>> What’s the test to avoid "scope creep" into issues outside of ICANN’s mandate?<br>
><br>> What’s the process ICANN could use to involve bottom-up work on answering the challenge of Montevideo, Brasil Summit, and ITU?<br>><br>> Jonathan Robinson <<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info">jrobinson@afilias.info</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> Please respond to this thread with any question/s you propose to raise tomorrow
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>