<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">hi Avri,<div><br></div><div>the DSSA brought this report to the Council a while back (time doesn't permit figuring out exactly when). the report was caught in the usual logjam of crisis stuff and was given a very brief acknowledgement at that time.</div><div><br></div><div>i would love an extensive discussion in the community and on this list.</div><div><br></div><div>the part you're quoting though isn't from the report -- that's based on the letter of submission from us co-chairs to our respective Councils (which we should have linked to this motion -- but didn't, so i've attached it to this note). in that letter, we co-chairs are pretty emphatic that the "go ahead with Phase II" option is a bad idea, and that sentence is part of our justification as to why we think that way.</div><div><br></div><div>sorry for soo terse. hope this helps. happy to discuss on the call</div><div><br></div><div>mikey</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div></div></body></html>