<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I think it would be a good idea to have
someone reliable and knowledge to report back and the ex councilor
idea seems also a good one. I second to put this proposal for
discussion at the weekend in Singapore.<br>
<br>
Klaus<br>
<br>
On 12/11/2013 6:03 PM, John Berard wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:9F3FB927-95C6-4B1F-8F9E-F315554B51BC@aol.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>The idea to fund a ccNSO liaison from among the GNSO
Councillors leaving their seat has been floated but little
discussed. Perhaps we ought to put it on the weekend agenda for
Singapore</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Berard<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Dec 11, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Maria Farrell <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:maria.farrell@gmail.com">maria.farrell@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi John,<br>
<br>
Many thanks for this summary and indeed for getting up
at 0400 to be able to provide it to us.<br>
<br>
</div>
I agree with your suggestion, and David's support, for a
funded liaison person who can attend ccNSO and- David's
suggestion - GAC meetings that run at the same time as
ours. It could be a useful first step to figuring out
how to implement the ATRT2 recommendation that we
somehow get the GAC more active in GNSO PDPs. <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I wonder how we would go about discussing that in
more detail in the GNSO and, if appropriate, getting the
idea into the works?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
That said, I personally think you're doing a terrific job
keeping us informed about cc-world and it is really useful
to get these updates from you, with your day to day
knowledge of GNSO Council issues, e.g. the cross community
working group. You are in danger of making yourself
indispensable!<br>
<br>
</div>
Maria<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 11 December 2013 02:05, David
Cake <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dave@difference.com.au" target="_blank">dave@difference.com.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
On 11 Dec 2013, at 7:38 am, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>
wrote:<br>
> 4. As the GNSO Council liaison to the ccNSO
Council, I have already suggested, because we meet at
the same times during the three international
meetings, that someone just off the Council be asked
to fill the role. This brings up a question of
funding. I think the position should be funded and a
specific set of responsibilities attached. I am just
making this up as I go along.<br>
<br>
</div>
Regardless, it seems a valuable suggestion. We
have the same issue with the GAC - the major SOs and ACs
are all more or less so busy that they consume almost
all the time available at an ICANN meeting, making it
pretty much impossible to effectively monitor one if you
are an active participant in another. Liaisons are
seeming a more valuable idea with each meeting, and it
seem a practical necessity that they are not full
serving members of the origin group in order to have the
time to fully monitor the group they are outreaching to.
And of course funding is important, as the ability to
attend physical meetings is essential for the role.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
David<br>
</font></span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>