<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><div></div>
<!--EndFragment--><div><div>On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:56 AM, Maria Farrell <<a href="mailto:maria.farrell@gmail.com">maria.farrell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Jonathan,<br><br></div>I'm happy to support this, and thank you for drafting it. There's one small typo, track changes version attached. It's in para 1, page 3.<br><br></div>I'd have liked if we tackled head-on the issue of the narrowness of some PDP WGs' participation, which the ATRT2 report provided some pretty convincing numbers on. But as I haven't gone to the trouble of actually drafting anything on it, I can't complain. <br>
<br></div>All the best, Maria<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 February 2014 09:15, Avri Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
As a member of the ATRT2, I do not believe it my job to comment on our report.<br>
<br>
I think the GNSO response is fine as far as it goes and I am pleased that at least something is being submitted - though I must admit I am less than enthused about responses that essentially say "we are already doing that".<br>
<br>
I might have wished for it to be more supportive of other aspects of the report, but the response is what it is.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
On 21-Feb-14 09:43, Jonathan Robinson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
*_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 8 HOURS_*<br>
<br>
*From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:<a href="mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com" target="_blank">jonathan.robinson@<u></u>ipracon.com</a>]<br>
*Sent:* 20 February 2014 09:38<br>
*To:* <a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a><br>
*Subject:* RE: Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT<div class=""><br>
2) Final Report & Recommendations<br>
<br>
All,<br>
<br>
The deadline for submission of public comment on the ends approximately<br>
36 hours from now.<br>
<br>
I am OK to submit a letter in substantially the same for as that<br>
distributed to you on 14 Feb (see below) and re-attached to this letter.<br>
<br>
BUT<br>
<br>
I need your support to do so. Accordingly, even if you simply provide<br>
support without any comment on the content, that will be helpful.<br>
<br></div>
*_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 24 HOURS_*<br>
<br>
Thank-you.<br>
<br>
Jonathan<br>
<br>
*From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info" target="_blank">jrobinson@afilias.info</a><u></u>]<br>
*Sent:* 14 February 2014 17:21<br>
*To:* <a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a><u></u>><br>
*Subject:* Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2)<br>
Final Report & Recommendations<br>
*Importance:* High<div class=""><br>
<br>
All,<br>
<br>
If you are not already, please be aware of the following:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/atrt2-recommendations-09jan14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/news/<u></u>public-comment/atrt2-<u></u>recommendations-09jan14-en.htm</a><br>
<br></div>
The opportunity to provide comments _ends one week from today 23h59 UTC<br>
on 21 Feb 2014_.<div class=""><br>
<br>
The ATRT2 interacted with many in the community during the course of its<br>
work, including directly with the GNSO Council which was certainly<br>
appreciated. We now have an opportunity to comment on the final report.<br>
<br>
If we do intend to comment, my opinion is that we should at least submit<br>
an indication of intent, if not the primary comment, in the initial<br>
comment period and not wait for the reply period.<br>
<br>
Given the tight time frame, I have taken the unusual step of drafting a<br>
council response for your consideration. The ATRT2 deals with some<br>
critical areas of GNSO work and function and so it seems to me that we<br>
should respond to the call for comments, specifically in so far as the<br>
report deals with GNSO Policy and directly related areas.<br>
<br>
I am aware that some of you were on the ATRT2 and others actively worked<br>
on Council interaction with the ATRT2. Therefore, you may well have<br>
strong views on the subject matter.<br>
<br>
I look forward to your input and any suggestions.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Jonathan<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
<span><ATRT2 - Draft Council Input (14 February 2014).doc></span></blockquote></div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none; ">PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: <a href="http://www.haven2.com">www.haven2.com</a>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)</span>
</div>
<br></div></body></html>