<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Agree.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In fact, ignoring something like this might be a clear indication that the Community has a problem with the ICANN Board.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>J.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>"<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Friday, February 21, 2014 at 10:21 <br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>>, GNSO Council List <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>RE: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Avri,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Note my earlier email. It may be that no one will hear, but that does not mean we should not ask.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Berard</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="threadBlockQuote" style="border-left: 2px solid #C2C2C2; padding-left: 3px; margin-left: 4px;">
--------- Original Message ---------
<div>Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO<br>
From: "Avri Doria" <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
Date: 2/21/14 3:31 am<br>
To: "Council" <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Interesting idea, but what makes you think anyone on the Board would <br>
care what the crowd had to say. They barely care about what the duly <br>
constituted SOs, ACs or Review Teams have to say beyond what the by-laws <br>
force them to care about.<br>
<br>
Now, if we can get National government ministers to crowd source the <br>
review, maybe there is a chance they will pay attention.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
On 20-Feb-14 22:11, <a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a> wrote:<br>
> James,<br>
> Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling<br>
> somewhere. I figure we can do that.<br>
> Berard<br>
><br>
> --------- Original Message ---------<br>
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review<br>
> of the ICANN CEO<br>
> From: "James M. Bladel" <<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br>
> Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm<br>
> To: "Mike O'Connor" <<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com">mike@haven2.com</a>>, "John Berard"<br>
> <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>><br>
> Cc: "Council" <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>><br>
><br>
> Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other<br>
> SO/ACs in an effort to provide a “360” review.<br>
> J.<br>
> From: Mike O'Connor <<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com">mike@haven2.com</a> ><<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com>">mailto:mike@haven2.com></a>><br>
> Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35<br>
> To: John Berard <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a><br>
> <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com>">mailto:john@crediblecontext.com></a>><br>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a><br>
> <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>">mailto:council@gnso.icann.org></a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review<br>
> of the ICANN CEO<br>
> hi John,<br>
> i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i<br>
> went ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP — initial<br>
> reactions are positive. i personally think it’s a great idea.<br>
> mikey<br>
><br>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, <a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a><br>
> <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">mailto:john@crediblecontext.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> All,<br>
> I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London,<br>
> marks two years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's<br>
> President and CEO. In light of the interest driven by the<br>
> Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I wonder if we<br>
> should consider instigating a performance review of the<br>
> executive using that method.<br>
> We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report<br>
> for the London meeting. The standing for the Council is the<br>
> growing executive influence over policy, looking no further than<br>
> the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu of community-based<br>
> working groups.<br>
> What is your view?<br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Berard<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com<br>
> <<a href="http://www.haven2.com">http://www.haven2.com</a>>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,<br>
> Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)<br>
></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>