<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Mickey thank you so so much!!!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">
I was having a hard time in this call with noise in the line and small cuts so this will help me a lot to get the things I´ve missed!!!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">
:)</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Gabi</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">
<div><b style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,51,51)"><span lang="ES-AR" style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif">Gabriela Szlak </span></b></div><div style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:0px"><b style="color:rgb(0,51,51);font-size:x-small;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"><br></b></p><p style="font-size:13px;margin:0px"><b style="color:rgb(0,51,51);font-size:x-small;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif">Skype:</b><font style="color:rgb(0,51,51);font-size:x-small;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> gabrielaszlak</font><br>
</p><p style="font-size:13px;margin:0px"></p><p style="font-size:13px;margin:0px"><font color="#003333"><font size="1"><b style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif">Twitter: @</b><span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif">G</span><font style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif">abiSzlak</font></font><br style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:9px">
</font></p></div><p style="margin:0px"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></span></p><p style="margin:0px"><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font size="1">La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial. </font></span></p>
<div><div><span style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><font size="1">The information in this e-mail is confidential.</font></span></div></div><br></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-02-27 15:25 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
i agree. thanks.<br>
<br>
avri<div class=""><br>
<br>
On 27-Feb-14 18:38, James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">
As someone who missed the call – THANK YOU!<br>
<br>
J.<br>
<br>
<br></div>
From: Mike O'Connor <<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com" target="_blank">mike@haven2.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com" target="_blank">mike@haven2.com</a>>><div class=""><br>
Date: Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 10:33<br>
To: GNSO Council List <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org" target="_blank">council@gnso.icann.org</a><u></u>>><div class=""><br>
Subject: [council] Notes from today's GNSO Council call<br>
<br>
hi all,<br>
<br>
as many of you know, i’m an obsessive note-taker in meetings. i thought<br>
i would share my notes from the call this morning with this list and ask<br>
you to let me know if you would like me to continue sending them to this<br>
list as well. these are mostly for me, and my ISPCP colleagues (so pay<br>
no attention to the action-items, those are mostly for me). feel free<br>
to sing out if you find these annoying or unhelpful. these are NOT<br>
official minutes, just personal notes of one member.<br>
<br>
disclaimer — these are my notes and may contain errors of fact or<br>
understanding. if something in here makes you unhappy, check with me or<br>
the person before taking extreme action. :-)<br>
<br>
also note that item 6 and item 4 were reversed on the agenda, which is<br>
why these notes are not in strictest numeric sequence.<br>
<br>
mikey<br>
<br>
<br>
Council call - 27-Feb 2014<br>
<br>
*<br>
<br>
+ - Item 1: Administrative matters (10 mins)<br>
<br></div><div class="">
o 1.1 Roll Call<br>
o + - 1.2 Statement of interest updates<br>
+ Maria Farrell<br>
+ ~ <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Maria+Farrell+SOI" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<u></u>display/gnsosoi/Maria+Farrell+<u></u>SOI</a><br>
<<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Maria+Farrell+SOI" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<u></u>display/gnsosoi/Maria+Farrell+<u></u>SOI</a>><br></div>
o 1.3 Review/amend agenda<br>
o + - 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council<div class=""><br>
meeting per the GNSO Operating Procedures:<br></div>
+ Minutes of the GNSO Council meetings 23 January 2014 were<div class=""><br>
posted as approved on 17 February 2014.<br>
<br>
+ - Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10<br>
mins)<br>
<br></div>
o Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes /<br>
topics<br>
o Include review of Projects List and Action List.<br>
o + - Comments or questions arising.<br>
+ Action: note a diary entry to review the list prior to each<div class=""><br>
meeting - and forward to the ISPCP list<br>
<br>
Item 3: Consent agenda (0 mins)<br>
<br>
+ - Item 4: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – GNSO Engagement with the work of<br>
the ICANN Strategy Panels (15 mins)<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
+ - Here the Council will receive an update on any relevant<br>
interaction with and output from the strategy panels and discuss<br>
any appropriate action going forward.<br>
<br></div>
+ +- Update:<div class=""><br>
#<br>
<br>
+- Strat Panels are out for comment<br>
<br></div>
* ~ <a href="http://icann.org" target="_blank">icann.org</a> > En > News > Public-comment ><br>
Strategy-panels-25feb14-en<br>
<<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/strategy-panels-25feb14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/news/<u></u>public-comment/strategy-<u></u>panels-25feb14-en.htm</a>><br>
* ~ <a href="http://icann.org" target="_blank">icann.org</a> > En > News > Announcements ><br>
Announcement-2-25feb14-en<br>
<<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-25feb14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/news/<u></u>announcements/announcement-2-<u></u>25feb14-en.htm</a>><div class="">
<br>
<br>
Fadi's recent update to AC/SO chairs -- on role panels<br>
and their role in the strategy process -- concern about<br>
top-down was discussed<br>
<br>
+- MSI panel --<br>
<br>
*<br>
<br>
+- 16 proposals (here's a link to my little matrix<br>
of the proposals -- arrayed by Goal <--> Tool and<br>
Participation <--> Policy)<br>
<br></div>
o ~ <a href="http://haven2.com" target="_blank">haven2.com</a> > Wp-content > Uploads > 2007 > 07<br>
> PDP-Overview-GAC-GNSO-v5<br>
<<a href="http://www.haven2.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/PDP-Overview-GAC-GNSO-v5.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.haven2.com/wp-<u></u>content/uploads/2007/07/PDP-<u></u>Overview-GAC-GNSO-v5.jpg</a>><div class="">
<br>
<br>
+- Jonathan has reached out -- got off to a bit of a<br>
slow start -- but meetings 2 weeks ago and yesterday<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
+- flag waving - we're the Council and the GNSO<br>
- your work feels as though it overlaps our<br>
remit - so we are very tuned to you work<br>
<br></div>
+ Novak offered to do some kind of interview<div class=""><br>
-- Jonathan was uncomfortable<br>
<br>
+- Yesterday's meeting<br>
<br>
+<br>
<br>
working toward a meeting with 1/2 members of<br>
the staff (govLab) people in singapore<br>
<br>
opportunity to home in on a subset of the<br>
recommendations that are more closely<br>
related to the policy work of the GNSO<br>
<br>
+- 2 issues<br>
<br></div>
o +- "top down" concern<br>
+ Jonathan: best aimed at Fadi not the MSI panel<br>
+ +- Discussion<br>
# +- Berard<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
+- "this is something we need to talk about"<br>
reenforces the "executivification" of ICANN -- it's<br>
really hard for a part time person to stay above the<br>
raging water -- the community is becoming more<br>
professional -- this is driving some of our<br>
community members mad -- the more we can do to<br>
foster discussion at the broadest level in the<br>
community, the better<br>
<br></div>
o Jonathan shares concern over the raging water<br>
o Jonathan emphasises distinction between MSI<br>
content and MSI chartering<br>
# +- Amr<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
+- commisioning is very top down -- there is a lot<br>
of work going on -- that's where the changes would<br>
have to be reviewed<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
doesn't feel quite as concerned as others are<br>
<br>
+- Jonathan - we have the opportunity to engage<br>
-- maybe a written response to the panel from<br>
the council<br>
<br></div>
+ reaction to their work AND<br>
+ work that the GNSO is doing<br>
# +- Stoll<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
+- we need to inform them to alert them to overlaps<br>
AND we need to inform administration of concerns<br>
directly<br>
<br></div>
o comments seem to go into a black hole<br>
o be careful in the engagement<br>
# +- Chiao<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
volunteers -- substantial proportion of cycles going<br>
to IG issue<br>
<br>
registries -- implementation requirements,<br>
additional load of IG work -- overloaded is not just<br>
limited to volunteers in non-contracted parties.<br>
Ry's and Rr's are struggling to keep up with<br>
implementation requirements in addition to<br>
policy-making and IG discussion. Very hard,<br>
especially for smaller registries.<br>
<br>
+- ICANN is now representing all of our voices --<br>
will people outside of ICANN have a chance to talk<br>
with the community directly? Is ICANN trying to<br>
represent us, rather than letting that conversation<br>
take place directly?<br>
<br></div>
o maybe it's time for constituencies to step out<br>
# +- Greimann<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
topics are very worthwhile -- also helpful to have<br>
an outside voice -- however i think this effort<br>
should have come in the ICANN way -- thus they have<br>
a bit of a birth defect because of the way they were<br>
launched -- we shouldn't be deferential, give<br>
advice, should be seen as comparable to the GAC<br>
<br></div>
# +- Greenberg<div class=""><br>
*<br>
<br>
MSI - remember they were put in place to comment on<br>
the *whole* MS model, not just GNSO -- their remit<br>
is broader - they were asked to suggest changes -<br>
informed process -- they DID suggest changes and we<br>
need to embrace/refine their suggestions without<br>
appearing defensive<br>
<br></div>
+ +- Followup<br>
# Jonathan will follow up with Theresa about how we can<div class=""><br>
best interact with these panels<br>
<br>
+ - Item 5: UPDATE – PDP Working Group on Translation &<br>
Transliteration of Contact Information (10 mins)<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
The GNSO Council recently initiated a Policy Development Process<br>
(PDP) on the Translation and Transliteration of Contact<br>
Information. As part of its efforts to obtain broad input from<br>
the ICANN Community at an early stage of its deliberations, the<br>
Working Group has requested input from the Supporting<br>
Organizations (including the GNSO) and Advisory Committees on<br>
several questions relating to the issues identified in the PDP<br>
Final Issue Report.<br>
<br>
+ - 5.1 – Update (Ching Chiao)<br>
<br></div>
+ presented by Chris Dillon - cochair<br>
+ +- request for input - deadline is tomorrow<br>
# <a href="https://community.icann.org/x/FTR-Ag" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/<u></u>FTR-Ag</a><br>
<br>
+ - 5.2 – Discussion<br>
<br>
+ +- Chiao - thanks Chris, encourages comments from<br>
constituencies<br>
# Action: remind ISPCP of need for input<div class=""><br>
<br>
5.3 – Next steps<br>
<br>
+ - Item 6: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – International Internet Governance<br>
Issues (20 mins)<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
Discussions and activity relating to international Internet<br>
Governance issues are attracting a great deal of attention in<br>
ICANN and related groups. This item is on the agenda to provide<br>
an opportunity for discussion within the Council about how this<br>
impacts the role and work of the Council and mindful of the<br>
scope and remit of the Council, what action the Council should<br>
or could be taking.<br>
<br>
+ - 4.1 – Status update (Sally Costerton)<br>
<br></div>
+ Jonathan: what should be focusing on at Council<br>
+ +- Sally:<br>
# +- several streams around IG<br>
* +- Background<div class=""><br>
o<br>
<br>
+- Buenos Aires - became clear that profile of<br>
IG was increasing - triggered by Snowden issue<br>
<br></div>
+ the rest of the world had "woken up"<br>
+ resurfaced WCIT issues<div class=""><br>
<br>
very full IG calendar in 2014<br>
<br>
Fadi's view - sense that there is frustration<br>
over how hard IG issues are to resolve<br>
<br>
ITU - march toward their meeting late in the<br>
year -- debate around whether they're going to<br>
change their remit<br>
<br>
if we don't participate others will do it for us<br>
<br></div>
* +- 1Net<div class=""><br>
o<br>
<br>
discussion forum where debate is taking place in<br>
great detail<br>
<br>
now has a steering committee<br>
<br>
+- web forum is up and running -- discussion is<br>
migrating that direction -- much easier to<br>
follow than the overwhelming traffic on the<br>
email list<br>
<br></div><div class="">
+ ~ <a href="https://forum.1net.org/" target="_blank">https://forum.1net.org/</a><br>
<<a href="https://forum.1net.org/" target="_blank">https://forum.1net.org/</a>><br>
* +- CCWG<br></div>
o discuss and collect input<br>
o meeting weekly<br>
o goal: position by the end of March<br>
o +- email archive<br>
+ <a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-internet-governance/" target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/<u></u>ccwg-internet-governance/</a><br>
o +- web page<br>
+<br>
<br>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/CPMMB/ICANN+Community+Preparation+for+the+Multistakeholder+Meeting+in+Brazil+Home" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<u></u>display/CPMMB/ICANN+Community+<u></u>Preparation+for+the+<u></u>Multistakeholder+Meeting+in+<u></u>Brazil+Home</a><br>
<br>
* +- Hi Level Panel (5th panel)<br>
o +- 3 f2f meetings<br>
+ December<br>
+ now<br>
+ May<br>
o there is to be a submission to the Brazil meeting<br>
* +- NetMundial<br>
o goal: HOW to decide, not decide<br>
o submissions of principle and framework<br>
o late April, just after Easter<br>
o hosted by Brazilian govt<br>
o 4 cochairs<br>
o Hi level committee -- just met this week --<div class=""><br>
goal: good attention/attendance by governments<br></div>
o deadline for registration is tomorrow (28-Feb)<br>
o +- registration web page<div class=""><br>
+ ~ <a href="http://content.netmundial.br" target="_blank">content.netmundial.br</a> > Interests ><br>
Expression<br>
<<a href="http://content.netmundial.br/interests/expression" target="_blank">http://content.netmundial.br/<u></u>interests/expression</a>><br></div>
o +- overall web page<div class=""><br>
+ ~ <a href="http://netmundial.br" target="_blank">netmundial.br</a> <<a href="http://netmundial.br/" target="_blank">http://netmundial.br/</a>><br>
* +- Singapore<br></div>
o NCSG event -- starts at 10am, Friday before<div class=""><br>
meeting, 10:00 - 18:00, followed by reception<br>
w/Fadi<br></div>
o Several events during the ICANN meetings<br>
<br>
+ - 4.2 – Discussion<br>
<br>
+ +- Berard;<div class=""><br>
#<br>
<br>
+- ccNSO: categories of participation in NetMudial<br>
meetingdon't make room for ccTLD managers -- is this a<br>
metaphor for the way that IG discussions aren't leaving<br>
room for individual members of ICANN<br>
<br></div>
* +- tactical - ccNSO members?<br>
o open registration meeting - everybody is welcome<div class=""><br>
- first come first served attendance<br></div>
o strongly encourage participation<div class=""><br>
<br>
+- Snowden revelations provide excellent cover for<br>
political intent -- what is Fadi's public position on this?<br>
<br>
*<br>
<br>
Maria Farrell: John - the Montevideo statement sets<br>
out pretty clearly the concern re. pervasive<br>
monitoring and Internet stewardship. Fadi signed it<br>
for ICANN so I think it's fair to say he sees a<br>
link. Even if some use the Snowden revelations<br>
tactically, the fact remains that many have lost<br>
faith in the impartiality of the USG.<br>
<br>
+- Costerton: get asked questions about<br>
globalization of ICANN and Snowden - we don't have a<br>
particular view - realization within the US govt<br>
that structures may need to change<br>
<br></div>
o need to reenforce other voices at the table<div class=""><br>
<br>
+- Richard Clark transcript -- the two issues are as far<br>
apart as one could find<br>
<br></div><div class="">
*<br>
<br>
~ <a href="http://windowsitpro.com" target="_blank">windowsitpro.com</a> > Identity-management ><br>
Richard-clarke-rsa-conference-<u></u>10-observations-us-<u></u>intelligence-gathering<br>
<<a href="http://windowsitpro.com/identity-management/richard-clarke-rsa-conference-10-observations-us-intelligence-gathering" target="_blank">http://windowsitpro.com/<u></u>identity-management/richard-<u></u>clarke-rsa-conference-10-<u></u>observations-us-intelligence-<u></u>gathering</a>><br>
<br></div>
+ +- Farrell<div class=""><br>
#<br>
<br>
+- Board resolution on globalization - disquite on lack<br>
of consultation, yet more CEO appointed panels, a lot of<br>
CEO-led activity going on. concern about Council role<br>
in this ad hoc series of actions by administration<br>
<br>
*<br>
<br>
+- Board chair saw a lot of email on this -- perhaps<br>
the 1net list?<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
~ Marika Konings: Please note that this is the<br>
email from Steve Crocker that Sally was<br>
referring to:<br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/002194.html" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/<u></u>pipermail/discuss/2014-<u></u>February/002194.html</a><br>
<<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/002194.html" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/<u></u>pipermail/discuss/2014-<u></u>February/002194.html</a>><br>
<br>
Costerton; with her engagement hat on -- groups are<br>
to facilitate the discussion that you have described<br>
Maria -- they will be in Singapore and given a<br>
public block - Council needs to know that their role<br>
is to act as facilitator<br>
<br>
+- Avri would very much have liked to participate<br>
the process of setting this up - post is coming to<br>
the list<br>
<br></div>
o Action: watch for that post<br>
+ +- Cake:<br>
# +- is there anything that the Council or SGs should do?<br>
* reach out to communities and encourage them to<br>
participate in Netmundial<br>
* +- take a look at the BCG report<br>
o ~ <a href="http://icann.org" target="_blank">icann.org</a> > En > News > Announcements ><br>
Announcement-24jan14-en<br>
<<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-24jan14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/news/<u></u>announcements/announcement-<u></u>24jan14-en.htm</a>><br>
+ +- Chiao<div class=""><br>
#<br>
<br>
congratulates Costerton on ASIAPAC engagement -- AsiaPAC<br>
members would like to be more engaged with the actual<br>
meetings, not just talking to people in the region,<br>
bring people to the meeting table and actually contribute<br>
<br>
4.3 – Next steps<br>
<br>
+ - Item 7: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – GAC Engagement – the work of the<br>
Joint GAC / GNSO Consultation Group (15 mins)<br>
<br></div>
o Here the Council will receive an update and discuss any action<br>
going forward.<br>
o + - 7.1 – Status update<br>
+ +- Amr:<br>
# +- Reviewed charter --<br>
* <a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140212/c6e3f7b6/GAC-GNSO-final-0001.pdf" target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/<u></u>gac-gnso-cg/attachments/<u></u>20140212/c6e3f7b6/GAC-GNSO-<u></u>final-0001.pdf</a><br>
# Two work streams - PDP early engagement and day to day<br>
interaction<br>
o + - 7.2 – Discussion<br>
+ +- Mikey<br>
# Charter is done, proposals are in progress<br>
o 7.3 – Next steps<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
+ - Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – Forthcoming review of the GNSO (10<br>
mins)<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
As part of a periodic review process that is built into the<br>
ICANN model, ICANN board initiated reviews of the GNSO (and the<br>
GNSO Council and related functions) are expected. In order to<br>
be informed and effectively prepared for this work, we have<br>
begun to engage with the body that commissions such reviews (the<br>
structural improvements committee) through its chair, Ray Plazk.<br>
<br>
The Council will track the planning work of the SIC and, where<br>
appropriate; provide relevant input to the process. We will<br>
also prepare to undertake a form of self-review in a similar<br>
format to that which we expect to arise out of the work of the<br>
SIC. A self-review will ensure that we are not only prepared<br>
for the board initiated work but also able to flag areas for<br>
potential improvement in as timely as possible a manner.<br>
<br>
+ - 8.1 – Update (Jennifer Wolfe)<br>
<br>
+<br>
<br>
there is no update since the last meeting -- still waiting<br>
for an update from Ray<br>
<br>
Jonathan: will there be a document prior to Singapore?<br>
Marika: nothing expected to be published before Singapore<br>
<br>
8.2 – Discussion<br>
<br>
8.3 – Next steps<br>
<br>
+ - Item 9: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – Planning for Singapore (15 mins)<br>
<br>
o<br>
<br>
Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available<br>
at the ICANN Meeting in Buenos Aires will take planning. GNSO<br>
Council Vice Chair, David Cake will lead this and will be<br>
working with the Council and staff on this effort.<br>
<br>
Here the Council has the opportunity to feed into plans and<br>
provide input based on past experience. Included in this item<br>
will be the opportunity to shape the approach to and substance<br>
of the Council’s proposed meetings with other groups in such as<br>
the CCNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.<br>
<br>
+ - 9.1 – Update (David Cake & Jonathan Robinson)<br>
<br></div></div>
+ Cake: very much Draft,<div class=""><br>
<br>
9.2 – Discussion<br>
<br>
+ - 9.3 – Next steps<br>
<br></div>
+ Action: forward the draft schedule to the ISPCP list if it<div class=""><br>
hasn't been already -- DONE<br>
<br>
+ - Item 10: Any Other Business (10 mins)<br>
<br></div>
o + - Community budget requests<br>
+ +- requests from the Council:<br>
# Council development session,<br>
# face-to-face PDP meetings (potential for facilitation),<br>
# GAC GNSO reverse liaison (placeholder)<br>
o + - ICANN Board Seat 14 – NCPH - additional Council meeting<div class=""><br>
Thursday, 10 April 2014 at 14:00 UTC<br></div>
+ this is a placeholder for that meeting -- Glen to follow up<div class=""><br>
to the list -- rationale for meeting<br></div>
o + - Note the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC)<br>
presence in Singapore<br>
+ Action: schedule them with ISPCP on Tuesday?<br>
+ Action: note public session to ISPCP list<br>
o + - Meeting Strategy WG has draft out for comment<br>
+ +- Action: forward to ISPCP list - DONE<br>
# ~ <a href="http://icann.org" target="_blank">icann.org</a> > En > News > Public-comment ><br>
Meetings-strategy-25feb14-en<br>
<<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/meetings-strategy-25feb14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/news/<u></u>public-comment/meetings-<u></u>strategy-25feb14-en.htm</a>><br>
+ Action: comments from ISPCP? - DONE<br>
o + - Amr: EWG process -- is Issue report the same as the EWG<div class=""><br>
final report?<br>
+<br>
<br>
Marika: important to separate the two. final report due<br>
London, may be another round of public comment.<br>
<br>
There is already an initial report underway -- EWG will feed<br>
into that Issue Report, which will proceed to PDP because<br>
it's Board initiated<br>
<br>
PHONE: <a href="tel:651-647-6109" value="+16516476109" target="_blank">651-647-6109</a>, FAX: <a href="tel:866-280-2356" value="+18662802356" target="_blank">866-280-2356</a>, WEB: <a href="http://www.haven2.com" target="_blank">www.haven2.com</a><br>
</div>
<<a href="http://www.haven2.com" target="_blank">http://www.haven2.com</a>>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,<br>
LinkedIn, etc.)<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br></div>