<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Same here!<div><br></div><div>Thomas</div><div><br></div><div><br><div style=""><div>Am 24.03.2014 um 05:25 schrieb Reed, Daniel A <<a href="mailto:dan-reed@uiowa.edu">dan-reed@uiowa.edu</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Likewise<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org">mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Magaly Pazello<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:32 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Amr Elsadr<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Avri Doria; GNSO Council List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal">+1<br>
<br>
Magaly<br>
<br>
On Sunday, March 23, 2014, Amr Elsadr <<a href="mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org">aelsadr@egyptig.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> So do I. I believe this discussion is overdue. Thanks for suggesting it, James.<br>
><br>
> Amr<br>
><br>
> On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ACM.ORG">avri@ACM.ORG</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> I support including the discussion item in the agenda.<br>
>><br>
>> avri<br>
>><br>
>> On 23-Mar-14 20:26, James M. Bladel wrote:<br>
>>> Councilors:<br>
>>><br>
>>> As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas)<br>
>>> for a discussion during Wednesday’s open session. Would be happy to<br>
>>> hear comments/edits.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks—<br>
>>><br>
>>> J.<br>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>><br>
>>> *Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of<br>
>>> national data protection laws with the 2013 RAA *<br>
>>><br>
>>> Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN’s<br>
>>> handling of their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements<br>
>>> under the 2013 RAA, particularly considering recent statements by<br>
>>> various data protection authorities that these requirements violate<br>
>>> national privacy laws. Other ICANN stakeholders have expressed concern<br>
>>> about the treatment of legal data protection requirements when the ICANN<br>
>>> contract appears to conflict with certain laws. Still other stakeholders<br>
>>> are concerned that the ability of law enforcement and private<br>
>>> enforcement actions to access data be kept in place. The RAA includes<br>
>>> language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement of the<br>
>>> data retention provisions. As this situation has now been ongoing for<br>
>>> over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO<br>
>>> Council and larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend<br>
>>> enforcement for any registrar requesting a waiver?<br>
>>><br>
><br>
><br>
> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>