<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=FR link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>Dear Councillors </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>Ahead of the official minutes, the following resolutions were passed by the GNSO Council at its meeting on Thursday, 5 June 2014.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><u><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>1. Motion to Close the Study Phase of GNSO Whois Policy Work<br><br><br></span></u><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>WHEREAS</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>1. In October 2007, the GNSO Council concluded that a comprehensive and objective understanding of key factual issues regarding the gTLD Whois system would benefit future GNSO policy development efforts (<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/">http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/</a>).</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>2. In 2008, the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) provided recommendations for Whois Studies </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>(<a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf">http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf</a>), which were taken into account as the hypothesis for each study were developed.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>3. Between 2009 and 2012 the GNSO Council had approved a number of studies on certain aspects of the Whois system, specifically, studies relating to Whois Misuse, Whois Privacy & Proxy Service Abuse and Whois Registrant Identification, a Whois Privacy & Proxy Relay & Reveal Feasibility Survey and a Whois Service Requirements Survey;</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>4. All the approved studies have now been completed and the results published (see <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/other/whois/studies">http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/other/whois/studies</a>);</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>5. The GNSO Council has reviewed the studies and their results (see summary document at <a href="http://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/executive-summary-studies-05jun14-en.pdf">http://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/executive-summary-studies-05jun14-en.pdf</a>)</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>6. The GNSO Council believes that the studies and their results may be helpful with respect to ongoing policy work within the GNSO and in the ICANN community concerning improvements </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>to and replacement of the Whois protocol and system.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>RESOLVED,</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>1. The GNSO Council thanks all the research teams that performed each of the approved studies, and hereby formally closes this study phase of the GNSO’s Whois policy work. </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>2. The GNSO Council encourages current and future community groups engaged in Whois policy work to continue to consult and review the results of the approved Whois studies, and to</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> recommend to the GNSO Council any future policy work which may need to be done by the GNSO as a result.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>3. The GNSO Council requests that the GNSO Council Chair communicates the completion of the Whois studies and their results to the GAC Chair.<br><br><br></span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b><u><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>2. Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on IGO and INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms</span></u></b><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>WHEREAS:</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>1. In November 2013 the GNSO Council had requested an Issue Report on the topic of amending the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use these curative rights protection mechanisms;</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>2. The GNSO Council’s request was the result of the GNSO Council’s adoption in November 2013 of a consensus recommendation from the PDP Working Group on the Protection of International Organization Identifiers in All gTLDs (IGO-INGO PDP WG);</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>3. ICANN staff published the Preliminary Issue Report on the Access by IGOs and INGOs to the Curative Rights Protections of the UDRP and URS in a public comment forum that opened on 10 March 2014, and closed on 6 May 2014;</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>4. ICANN staff have reviewed the public comments received, published a Report of Public Comments and updated the Issue Report accordingly;</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>5. The Final Issue Report on the Access by IGOs and INGOs to the Curative Rights Protections of the UDRP and URS was published on 26 May 2014 (<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-final-25may14-en.pdf">http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-final-25may14-en.pdf</a>);</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>6. The Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed with a Policy Development Process (PDP) limited to consideration of the issues discussed in the report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the topic is properly within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within the scope of the GNSO.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>RESOLVED:</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>1. The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and INGOs whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO PDP WG) and if so, in what way; or (ii) whether a separate narrowly-tailored procedure modeled on these curative rights protection measures to apply only to protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be developed.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'> </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='color:black'>2. The GNSO Council requests that the PDP Working Group be convened as soon as possible to fulfill the requirements of this PDP in an expedited manner.</span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>If you have any questions, please let me know.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>Thank you very much<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>Kind regards, <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>Glen</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span style='color:black'>Glen de Saint Géry <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span style='color:black'>GNSO Secretariat <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span style='color:black'><a href="mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org">gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span style='color:black'><a href="http://gnso.icann.org">http://gnso.icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></body></html>