<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Point taken. No problem with me to remove. Jonathan<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> David Cake [mailto:dave@difference.com.au] <br><b>Sent:</b> 25 June 2014 11:07<br><b>To:</b> John Berard<br><b>Cc:</b> <jrobinson@afilias.info>; <council@gnso.icann.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Yes, while it is helpful to note initiating constituency/stakeholder group/councillor in tracking the source of changes, and amendments should be recorded as having been moved if necessary, I don't believe this information should make its way into the text of motions. <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>David<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 25 Jun 2014, at 11:00 am, John Berard <<a href="mailto:john@crediblecontext.com">john@crediblecontext.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'>Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or stakeholder group?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'>Berard<br><br>Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'><br>On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info"><span style='color:purple'>jrobinson@afilias.info</span></a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>All,</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>To<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below (<b>additions in bold</b>).</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Thanks,</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Jonathan</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>--</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>WHEREAS:</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406"><span style='color:purple;text-decoration:none'>http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406</span></a>) to undertake a GNSO policy development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights protection mechanisms;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf"><span style='color:purple;text-decoration:none'>http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf</span></a>) which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014,<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>and the amendments proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf"><span style='color:purple;text-decoration:none'>http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf</span></a>);</b></span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>RESOLVED:</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>as amended by the 24 June 2014 proposals</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG);</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:15.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333'>3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve as the interim chair. </span><o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>