<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Councilors:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In preparation for our next meeting in Los Angeles, I would like to formally introduce the motion (below) to adopt the Final Report and Recommendations of the IRTP Part D PDP (IRTP-D) Working Group. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am also seeking a second for this motion. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional info.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks—</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>J.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<hr align="center" size=""3"" width=""95%"">
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>—</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<b>Motion on the Adoption of the IRTP Part D Final Report and Recommendations<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
Whereas<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
1.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>On 17 January 2013, the GNSO Council launched a Policy Development Process (PDP) on IRTP Part D [<span lang="EN-US"><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201301" style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">ht<span lang="EN-US">tp://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions
- 201301</span></span></span></a></span>] addressing the following six Charter questions:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
a)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether reporting requirements for registries and dispute providers should be developed, in order to make precedent and trend information available to the community
and allow reference to past cases in dispute submissions;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
b)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether additional provisions should be included in the TDRP (Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy) on how to handle disputes when multiple transfers have occurred;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
c)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether dispute options for registrants should be developed and implemented as part of the policy (registrants currently depend on registrars to initiate a dispute
on their behalf);<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
d)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether requirements or best practices should be put into place for registrars to make information on transfer dispute resolution options available to registrant;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
e)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether existing penalties for policy violations are sufficient or if additional provisions/penalties for specific violations should be added into the policy;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 36pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
f)<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>Whether the universal adoption and implementation of EPP AuthInfo codes has eliminated the need of FOAs.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
2.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>This PDP has followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the Bylaws, resulting in a Final Report delivered on 25 September 2014;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
3.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>The IRTP Part D WG has reached full consensus on the 18 recommendations in relation to the six issues outlined above;<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
4.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>The GNSO Council has reviewed and discussed these recommendations.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
Now therefore be it resolved,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
1.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors the adoption of the IRTP Part D recommendations (#1 to #18) as detailed in the IRTP Part D Final Report
[<span lang="EN-US"><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/transfers/irtp-d-final-25sep14-en.pdf" style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-US"><span lang="EN-US">http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/transfer<span lang="EN-US">s/irtp-d-final-25sep14-en.pdf</span></span></span></a></span>].<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; line-height: 17px;">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 18pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri; text-indent: -18pt; line-height: 17px;">
2.<span style="font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span>The GNSO Council shall convene an IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing the implementation details for the new policy should
it be approved by the ICANN Board. The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating the proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by the Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the resultant implementation
fulfils the intentions of the approved policies. If the IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team identifies any potential modifications to the policy or new policy recommendations, the IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team shall refer these to the GNSO Council
for its consideration and follow-up, as appropriate. Following adoption by the ICANN Board of the recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is authorized to issue a call for volunteers for an IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team to the members of the IRTP Part
D Working Group.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>