<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div><div><div>Hello Gabi and all,</div><div><br></div><div>FWIW the "minimum of 2/maximum of 5” model for membership in a Cross Community Working Group (CWG) was also applied to the ongoing CWG that’s developing a Framework of Operating Principles for Future CWGs, co-chaired by Becky Burr (ccNSO) and John Berard (GNSO).</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Mary</div><div><br></div><div><div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Mary Wong</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4892</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email: mary.wong@icann.org</font></font></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 8:43 PM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span> GNSO Council List <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org">gnso-secs@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org">gnso-secs@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
Hi,<br><br>
This is the same membership basis that was used for the CWG-Stewardship, a charter the council already approved. In fact ths cahrter was patterned off of that with the missions and goals being different, but the modalities being similar. I do not recall any
discussion during the drafting about a larger representation.<br><br>
Only the CSG-Internet had the larger membership count, it was the exception given if long operation as an ad-hoc group without a charter.<br><br>
Incidentally, the team from the GNSO on this drafting team consisted of:<br><br><p><strong>GNSO</strong>:</p><p>Avri Doria</p><p>Keith Drazek</p><p>David Fares</p><p><strong>Thomas Rickert (co-chair)</strong></p><br><br>
I hope that helps clarify.<br><br>
avri<br><br><br><br>
On 06-Nov-14 17:41, Gabriela Szlak wrote:<br><span style="white-space: pre;">> Dear all,<br>
><br>
> Thanks so much for the hard work on this.<br>
><br>
> Regarding the charter, I would like to ask a clarifying question on the<br>
> issue of membership of the CCWG.<br>
><br>
> The charter says:<br>
><br>
> *"Each of the chartering organizations shall appoint a minimum of 2 and a<br>
> maximum of 5 members to the working group in accordance with their own<br>
> rules and procedures"*<br>
><br>
> ¿Could we clarify before the next council call what this means?<br>
><br>
> I recall a long discussion in LA on membership regarding the Charter for<br>
> the CCWG on IG so I would like to be sure we all understand the language,<br>
> as I am not sure I do, and Susan and I need to report to BC members and ask<br>
> for guidance on this topic. There is a huge amount of work to be done on<br>
> this CCWG and we believe that diversity of expertise and viewpoints in<br>
> membership is crucial to achieve to proposed goals.<br>
><br>
> Thanks a lot,<br>
> Gabi<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> *Gabriela Szlak *<br>
><br>
><br>
> *<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="Skype:*">Skype:*</a> gabrielaszlak<br>
><br>
> *Twitter: @*GabiSzlak<br>
><br>
><br>
> La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.<br>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2014-11-03 19:16 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:avri@acm.org">
<avri@acm.org></a>:<br>
><br>
>></span><br><blockquote type="cite">Hi,<br><br>
I second the motion.<br><br>
As a member of the DT, I also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit<br>
of the DT group. We are getting better at starting up these CWG efforts,<br>
and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far shorter<br>
than my predictions.<br><br>
avri<br><br><br>
On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:<br>
>>> All,<br>
>>> please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the<br>
adoption of<br>
>>> the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my<br>
co-chair<br>
>>> Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short<br>
time span<br>
>>> in a most collaborative fashion.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks,<br>
>>> Thomas<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br><br></blockquote><span style="white-space: pre;">>><br>
>><br>
></span><br><br><br></div></div></blockquote></span></body></html>