<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Ed:</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Again, sorry for the mix up. Thanks for collecting these links and we'll get this fixed ASAP. <br>
<br>
Thank you,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>J.</div>
<div>____________</div>
<div>James Bladel</div>
<div>GoDaddy</div>
</div>
<div><br>
On Dec 26, 2015, at 05:00, Edward Morris <<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif; font-size: 12px">
<div>Hi James,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks for this.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I did receive an e-mail from one of our hard working colleagues asking if the NCSG opinion was not, in fact, merely a composite of the NPOC and NCUC opinions. Actually, the answer to that is 'no'. The noncommercial space is a bit different than the others
to work in. Although most of our NCSG members belong to the NPOOC, the NCUC or both, similar in some ways to the CSG, we do have members who belong to neither constituency and instead are members of the NCSG only, similar to members in the CPH SGs. In addition,
the leadership of the NCSG, NPOC and NCUC are generally different and as with our Councillors, who are not normally bound on their votes, leaders of these groups generally have freedom of conscience in their actions. For example, in it's CCWG comments the
NPOC approved of all twelve recommendations, the NCSG did not approve of four, yet Sam Lanfranco, who is both the Chair of the NPOC policy committee and an appointee to the NCSG PC, joined in declaring consensus approving the NCSG comment.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Each NCSG Councillor is elected at the SG level and is charged with representing on Council all members be they NPOC, NCUC or unitary NCSG members. In doing so, we obviously consult with the members themselves and the elected leadership of all three groups.
I hope this better explains why certain structural issues that have arisen recently might be a bit more salient for us in the NCSG than for Councillors from groups with a more unitary remit.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you could re-submit your message with the noncommercial links as follows it would be much appreciated:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)</div>
<div>Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html">
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group<br>
Comment - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html">
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html</a></div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group<br>
Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html">
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html</a></div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks James. Here's hoping that Santa was good to you and your family and that everyone on Council, s well as our fine staff, is having a wonderful and peaceful holiday season.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kind Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ed Morris</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div style="-webkit-touch-callout: none; -webkit-user-select: none; -khtml-user-select: none;-moz-user-select: none;-ms-user-select: none;-o-user-select: none;user-select: none;">
</div>
<div> </div>
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
<div><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><b>From</b>: "James M. Bladel" <<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent</b>: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:34 PM<br>
<b>To</b>: "Edward Morris" <<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>><br>
<b>Cc</b>: "Marika Konings" <<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</a>>, "GNSO Council List" <<a href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org">council@gnso.icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject</b>: Re: [council] FW: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal</span>
<div> </div>
<div>Hi Ed. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Sorry for the error. If you can send the links as you'd like them to appear, we will send a correction. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">J. <br>
<br>
Sent via iPhone. Blame Siri.
<div> </div>
</div>
<div><br>
On Dec 24, 2015, at 16:01, Edward Morris <<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>Hi James,</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Thanks for all of your hard work on this.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">There is a mistake in the links section of your letter to the CCWG Chairs. The Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) and the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) submitted separate public comments. They are both attributed,
below, to the NCUC. The NCSG statement was drafted with participation of members of both the NCUC and NPOC and was endorsed by the policy committee of the NCSG, which consists of representatives of both constituencies. The NCUC and NPOC statements were drafted
by and endorsed by the appropriate committees of each constituency.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Although similar in content (as are to each other the three statements submitted by members of the Commercial Stakeholders Group) there are differences between the three noncommercial comments that should be acknowledged and properly
respected as we begin the process of consolidation. I realize that it is rare for the three non-commercial entities to all submit comments on a topic yet when there are differences in approach, such as here, it does happen. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">I would respectfully request that your letter be corrected and re-sent. I certainly don't want the Chairs or one of us to skip over a full set of comments on the mistaken belief that the NCUC sent the same set of comments to the
list in different forms when, in fact, that is not the case. One of the comments attributed to the NCUC is actually a submission by the NCSG.</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Thanks,</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Ed Morris</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"> </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Dec 24, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Marika Konings <<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>For your information.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Marika</div>
<div> </div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Marika Konings <<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday 24 December 2015 at 10:55<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>>, Mathieu Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>>, Thomas Rickert <<a href="mailto:thomas@rickert.net">thomas@rickert.net</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>>, Alice Jansen <<a href="mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org">alice.jansen@icann.org</a>>, "James M. Bladel" <<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs</span></div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">24 DEC 2015</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to the
size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to the 12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment period.</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf of GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs). Additional submissions
were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that participate in the GNSO from within one or more SG/C. We have formed a team tasked with analyzing these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized position for consideration by the GNSO Council
in a special session convening on 14 January 2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will be transmitted to you immediately following this session.</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year. We are very near
the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Thank you,</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">James Bladel</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">GNSO Chair</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):</span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Comment - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Comment - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html</a></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Comment - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group</span></span></span></div>
<div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">Survey Response - <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html</a></span></span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>