<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 12, 2016, at 8:46 PM, <a href="mailto:policy@paulmcgrady.com" class="">policy@paulmcgrady.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<div class=""><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt;" class=""><div class="">Thanks Rubens. The use of "best practices" was in the original version that contracted parties sent around - I was pretty proud that I was able to keep it in! </div></span></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>I know that, but I trace the origins of this to some ICANN propositions in the early days of the Spec 11 discussion. </div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt;" class=""><div class=""> </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regarding your other comment, I guess I do't know where that leaves us since at least the GAC seems to know what abuses are. How do we solve this?</div></span></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>If elected officials in a city, state or country try to revoke the Law of Gravity, how citizens should deal with it ? </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>