<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">It seems that Board decided to detail how they plan to handle GAC advice:</div><div class=""><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gac-advice-process-handbook-06mar18-en.pdf" class="">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gac-advice-process-handbook-06mar18-en.pdf</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As another registry mentioned, "Curious how there is nothing in the new process about consulting the rest of the community if the GAC Advice overlaps with, is inconsistent with, or otherwise also falls into the jurisdiction of, other SOs or ACs."</div><div class="">That lacks, for instance, the usual comments from GNSO regarding advice overlapping with GNSO Policy, either existent or in the pipeline. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Do we want to make a GNSO Council comment ? Or perhaps including other SOs and ACs ? </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Rubens</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>