<div dir="ltr">Dear Council colleagues,<div><br></div><div>A reminder that one of the Action Items coming out of ICANN61 was:</div><div><br></div><div>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span><strong><u><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Review of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (<span class="gmail-il">IRTP</span>)<u></u><u></u></span></u></strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span><strong><u><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><span style="text-decoration:none"> </span><u></u></span></u></strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Action Item:</span></u></span><span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"></span></span><span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u><u></u></span></span></p><ul type="disc" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;margin-top:0in"><li class="gmail-m_-6538797820529722871MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0in"><span><i>GNSO Council</i></span><span><span> </span>to consider next steps, timing and provide guidance to ICANN Org on if, how, and when the review of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (<span class="gmail-il">IRTP</span>) should take place, factoring in ongoing discussion on the post-implementation policy review framework as well as the transfer issue that is being considered by the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Implementation Review Team.</span></li></ul>

<br></div><div>Jennifer Gore kindly requested our follow-up on the proposal presented at our March Council meeting. There is a clearly articulated connection to PPSAI IRT, which Darcy has put on Council's April agenda. From a logistical perspective, it seems sensible to put PPSAI IRT before IRTP on our April agenda, so that any direction from Council to PPSAI takes into account Darcy's update (also supported by her post to the Council list of 3 April). Please could you give specific thought to IRTP with a view to Council providing Jen Gore with guidance as soon as is practicable?</div><div><br></div><div>Many thanks and best wishes,</div><div><br></div><div>Heather</div></div>