<div>ICANN has sent a new letter to the Article 29 Working Party, including questions such as: <br></div><div><br></div><div><i>“Is there any additional information that ICANN could provide to put the WP29 in a position to issue a statement according to which the national supervisory authorities will not enforce the GDPR against ICANN and the contracted parties for a certain period of time and under certain to-be-negotiated conditions?”<br></i></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-jelinek-10may18-en.pdf" target="_blank" title="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-jelinek-10may18-en.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-jelinek-10may18-en.pdf</a><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-jelinek-10may18-en.pdf" target="_blank" title="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-jelinek-10may18-en.pdf" rel="nofollow"><br></a></div><div><br></div><div>I hope ICANN does not expect a response before 25 May... <br></div><div><br></div><div>—Ayden  <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>