<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Thanks for all of this story Vanda.<br>
    You know, the sad thing about this is that, in those days when Rod
    was CEO, I confronted him about this and he made it quite clear that
    this was a clear business decision. The ICANN roadshow went to the
    "markets" it thought would generate huge interest and concrete
    applications. <br>
    I gather that times have changed now, but I would be interested to
    find out if the current ICANN CEO and the Board still see the new
    gTLD round as a set of "markets" to address, rather than basing the
    round on the public interest.<br>
    Kindest regards,<br>
    <br>
    Olivier<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/08/2018 19:13, Maureen Hilyard
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGj=WWTvL8dX304HFdUmYobVjg0uDEgG_zQ9T87vDTQX9Geqjw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <span
style="font-size:12.8px;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">So
          - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH
          HEMISPHERE</span><br
style="font-size:12.8px;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">
        <br>
        <div>And focus on making a splash in the Pacific region as
          well..</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Vanda
          Scartezini <span dir="ltr"><<a
              href="mailto:vanda.scartezini@gmail.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">vanda.scartezini@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Some comments on Christopher points<br>
            <br>
            a) Community Priority Evaluations<br>
            what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the
            effort asked for community to prove support ( ltos of money
            to do this around the world ) was ignored during the
            analysis period and several community ( I have promoted few)
            faced auction though their competitors had no prove of
            community interest.<br>
            Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to
            make sure those items will be considered and none without
            similar qualifications will be compete with them. <br>
            <br>
            b)metrics <br>
            Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and "
            continuity". If organization has no capacity to support
            initial investment so it will fail in a couple years and all
            registrant had done to promote the new domain will be waste
            of money.<br>
            <br>
             I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this,
            myself talking with several organizations to enter. We had a
            reasonable success but the reality was there was NO
            PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South Hemisphere. Nothing in
            digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to Sao
            Paulo Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50
            attendees . We had 8 ( from 11 applied in Brazil)  that
            attended this meeting . Nothing else was done in South
            America.<br>
             When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big
            companies around South America I found just 1 that said they
            have no intention to apply if there was another round, all
            others responded YES, they had interest, please alert us, if
            there will be another round. <br>
            So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN
            SOUTH HEMISPHERE<br>
            <br>
            Vanda Scartezini<br>
            Polo Consultores Associados<br>
            Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004<br>
            01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil<br>
            Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253<br>
            Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <br>
            Sorry for any typos. <br>
            <div>
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson
                christopher" <<a
                  href="mailto:gtld-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">gtld-wg-bounces@atlarge-<wbr>lists.icann.org</a>
                on behalf of <a
                  href="mailto:cw@christopherwilkinson.eu"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">cw@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>>
                wrote:<br>
                <br>
                    Good afternoon:<br>
                <br>
                    I generally concur with Holly's priorities in
                addition to my questions regarding Competition and
                Jurisdiction.<br>
                <br>
                    Regards<br>
                <br>
                    CW<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                    > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche
                <<a href="mailto:h.raiche@internode.on.net"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">h.raiche@internode.on.net</a>>
                escribió:<br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > Folks<br>
                    > <br>
                    > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C,
                the issues that ALAC has been concerned with before and
                - I am suggesting - should concentrate on in its
                response include:<br>
                    > <br>
                    > Community Priority Evaluations<br>
                    > These applicants had priority, but the
                definition was narrow and few applications made it
                through on this. The definition needs to be revisited,
                and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and
                finalised BEFORE evaluation<br>
                    > <br>
                    > Metrics<br>
                    > Unde the general heading, the question is asked
                whether there should be success metrics.  We said - and
                I believe should continue to say - have metrics as to
                what success looks like from an ALAC perspective. <br>
                    > <br>
                    > PICS<br>
                    > Under global public interest, the question is
                asked whether there should continue to be PICS.  They
                are there because we argued for them - and still should
                <br>
                    > <br>
                    > Applications from outside the US/Europe<br>
                    > We expressed concern that most of the
                applications came from the US and, to a lesser extent,
                Europe.  We said this came down to a number of factors,
                including<br>
                    > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook -
                it should be more accessible, comprehensible, in
                different languages<br>
                    > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated
                round for developing countries<br>
                    > Possibility of variable fees<br>
                    > IDNs<br>
                    > The report mentions need for further work to be
                done on Universal Acceptance<br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > Happy to discuss<br>
                    > <br>
                    > Holly<br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                    > CPWG mailing list<br>
                    > <a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">CPWG@icann.org</a><br>
                    > <a
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/cpwg</a><br>
                    > ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                    > registration-issues-wg mailing list<br>
                    > <a
                  href="mailto:registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">registration-issues-wg@<wbr>atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
                    > <a
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/registration-issues-<wbr>wg</a><br>
                    ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                    CPWG mailing list<br>
                    <a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">CPWG@icann.org</a><br>
                    <a
                  href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/cpwg</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
                ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                GTLD-WG mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.<wbr>org</a><br>
                <a
              href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg</a><br>
            <br>
                Working Group direct URL: <a
              href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.org/<wbr>display/atlarge/New+GTLDs</a><br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                CPWG mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org" moz-do-not-send="true">CPWG@icann.org</a><br>
                <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/cpwg</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org">CPWG@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>