<div dir="ltr">Then are you saying that one of the policy sessions we have in Marrakech should be to discuss and develop an ALAC statement for the public comment?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 7:43 PM Holly Raiche <<a href="mailto:h.raiche@internode.on.net">h.raiche@internode.on.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">I agree - surprisingly - with both Justine and Olivier.<div><br></div><div>If you look at the Issues Page (the link one is instructed to use to provide comments), and the many comments quoted made about the challenges in participating - many of which we have made (<span class="gmail-m_-7408302320285309336Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>time constraints, same people commenting, complexity of issues - pages that feel like someone has been listening in on ALAC conversations) then we need a process to respond to this, and so far, no comments have been made either on the ALAC policy page or the Issues Page. So yes, this is ALAC’s opportunity both to set out our myriad difficulties in responding - and constructive suggestions. We can do this on our own policy page - and then AS ALAC - add comments to the Issues Page (as we are instructed to do), or individuals can go straight to the Issues Page and make their own comments. Either way, this is a issue ALAC has been talking about for ages and we need to at least agree on how to respond. So maybe we need to schedule something in Marrakech where we can coordinate a response to the issue - or at least respond via the policy page.</div><div><br></div><div>Holly<br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On May 11, 2019, at 6:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="gmail-m_-7408302320285309336Apple-interchange-newline"><div>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Dear Justine,<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail-m_-7408302320285309336moz-cite-prefix">On 09/05/2019 14:27, Justine Chew
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">I
would say NOT #3 Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations
and implementation because UNLESS the goal for topic has changed
substantially (and if someone can confirm this or otherwise) this
topic has been suggested by ICANN Org in response to the request
made by Jonathan Zuck at ICANN 64 in respect of the Board's
reaction to the CCTRT Final Report recommendations. I think we
should back Jonathan up on this, and it's an important CC topic.</blockquote>
<br>
But doesn't this do double duty with the policy commenting on:
<a class="gmail-m_-7408302320285309336moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg</a> ?<br>
Kindest regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>CPWG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org" target="_blank">CPWG@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>registration-issues-wg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org" target="_blank">registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg</a><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div>