<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Dear Olivier,<br><br>In answer to your question <span class="gmail_default">"</span><i><font color="#9900ff">But doesn't this do double duty with the policy commenting on: <a class="gmail-m_-7985632173722634747gmail-m_-3982333407144809714moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg</a></font></i>", my answer is this public comment you pointed out focuses on streamlining organisational reviews. While related, it does not seem to me to place emphasis on implementation. </div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_default" style="">The session I'm referring to is the one proposed by Theresa Swinehart at <a href="https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/icann65-proposed-topics" style="font-size:small">https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/icann65-proposed-topics</a> (no. 9): which reads:<br><br><b><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68);font-family:"Lucida Grande",Tahoma,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif">HIT: Enhance effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and their <u>implementation</u></span> </b> <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="">Status/Current Notes: <span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,207);font-family:"Lucida Grande",Tahoma,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif">HIT Under Review</span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="">Background//Importance/Timelines: <span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,207);font-family:"Lucida Grande",Tahoma,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif">In Kobe, the CCT review leadership requested that the ICANN org organize a session in Marrakesh to discuss ways in which the specific review teams, the Board and the ICANN org can work more productively toward useful outcomes from Specific Reviews. Given the importance of specific reviews as an accountability measure, and with all specific reviews currently in various stages of work and implementation, ICANN65 offers a timely opportunity for a productive discussion, leading to concrete improvements. Specific Reviews are conducted by community-led teams, and under the new Bylaws, the ICANN community has new powers and responsibilities related to this work.</span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="">Session Goals and Expected Outcomes: <span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,207);font-family:"Lucida Grande",Tahoma,Arial,Verdana,sans-serif"><u>Broad community discussion on three topics of importance: 1) how to improve costing and implementation of review recommendations, 2) how to develop a process to prioritize and establish sustainable cadence of implementations across various reviews, and </u><b><u>3) the establishment of a protocol for handling specific review recommendations.</u></b> It is intended that a robust and broadly representative discussion <u>will inform next steps and the specific review work currently underway (RDS-WHOIS2, SSR2 and ATRT3</u>) <b><u>as well as the implementation of CCT recommendations</u></b>. <u>Community input will also guide implementation of WS2, inform the overall effort of streamlining specific reviews. Community input will inform potential changes to the operating standards for specific reviews.</u></span><u style=""></u></div><br><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">So in fact, Theresa's proposed session could inform/help shape At-Large/ALAC's policy positions for the public comment you pointed to, which closes after ICANN65. </div><br><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Thanks,<br><br></span>Justine<br>-----<br></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 05:05, Maureen Hilyard <<a href="mailto:maureen.hilyard@gmail.com">maureen.hilyard@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Some good questions to get stuck into with that PC<div><br></div><div><ul><li style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Oxygen,Ubuntu,"Fira Sans","Droid Sans","Helvetica Neue",sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(240,248,255)">Do you/your organization agree with the proposed list of issues that should form the focus of the streamlining process? If not, with which do you disagree and what would you like to add?</li><li style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Oxygen,Ubuntu,"Fira Sans","Droid Sans","Helvetica Neue",sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(240,248,255)">Do you/your organization agree with the proposed underlying principles that should guide the solutions? If not, with which do you disagree and what would you like to add?</li><li style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Oxygen,Ubuntu,"Fira Sans","Droid Sans","Helvetica Neue",sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(240,248,255)">Do you/your organization agree with the community role in the streamlining process? If not, what would you propose?</li><li style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Oxygen,Ubuntu,"Fira Sans","Droid Sans","Helvetica Neue",sans-serif;font-size:14px;background-color:rgb(240,248,255)">Do you/your organization agree with the proposed high-level timeline? If not, what would you propose?</li></ul></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:09 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Dear Justine,<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail-m_-7985632173722634747gmail-m_-3982333407144809714moz-cite-prefix">On 09/05/2019 14:27, Justine Chew
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">I
would say NOT #3 Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations
and implementation because UNLESS the goal for topic has changed
substantially (and if someone can confirm this or otherwise) this
topic has been suggested by ICANN Org in response to the request
made by Jonathan Zuck at ICANN 64 in respect of the Board's
reaction to the CCTRT Final Report recommendations. I think we
should back Jonathan up on this, and it's an important CC topic.</blockquote>
<br>
<span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>But doesn't this do double duty with the policy commenting on:
<a class="gmail-m_-7985632173722634747gmail-m_-3982333407144809714moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/LImGBg</a> ?<br>
Kindest regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>