<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Tomorrow in the CPWG meeting, we will be looking for ideas on
how the multistakeholder<b> processes </b>currently in effect
can be improved. The following broad issues were identified -- I
have thrown in a few questions to promote discussion -- but we
need some real suggestions about how to move forward.<br>
</p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Precision in scoping
-- too wide/too narrow?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Prioritization --
evening out the work flow, identifying which issues are most
important? Relating that to the cost of implementation. Too many
urgent items on the table at the same time, not enough
volunteers to carry the load<br>
</font></p>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Efficient use of
resources -- time, money and people -- is there a lot of wasteage?
How can that be improved? How to ease the volunteer burnout
problems</font><br>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Work processes -- do
we have adequate tools to do the jobs required? Is engagement
sporadic? Are team members well briefed and supported? Does the
MS model, as it is practised at ICANN adequately deal with
language and cultural barriers?<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Costs -- not just
financial, but also volunteer time. Would more financial
resources improve things? Is there enough transparency around
costing? How are costing and priorizing related?<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"></font>Marita<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>