[Ctn-crosscom] UPDATED questionnaire 3-letter codes

[Lars Hoffmann]

Dear Colin, dear all,
Thanks already to those that have provided feedback and of course, some
encouragement to others to follow suit. I will collate all comments
received and sent out a first version of these collated comments on Friday
in time for Monday¹s call - that we will update as we go along and more
responses come in. 
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars

 

On 18/08/2015 02:48, "Colin O'Brien" <colin at partridgegarcia.com> wrote:

>Hello Lars,
>
>Thank you for all your work on the questionnaire.  Attached are my
>initial comments.
>
>Cordially,
>
>Colin
>________________________________________
>From: ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org [ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org] On
>Behalf Of Annebeth Lange [annebeth.lange at uninett.no]
>Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 3:11 AM
>To: Lars Hoffmann; ctn-crosscom at icann.org
>Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] UPDATED questionnaire 3-letter codes
>
>Dear Lars and all,
>
>Thank you for sending out the updated version of the questionnaire, Lars.
>I hereby enclose my initial comments and encourage everybody to do the
>same and to inform you respective SO/AC to initiate a discussion on this
>difficult issue.
>
>Kind regards,
>Annebeth
>
>
>
>
>Annebeth B. Lange
>Head of Legal and Policy
>UNINETT Norid AS
>C. J. Hambros plass
>NO-0164 OSLO
>annebeth.lange at uninett.no<mailto:annebeth.lange at uninett.no>
>Mobile: +47 959 11 559
>
>
>
>
>From: Lars Hoffmann
><lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
>Date: Friday 14 August 2015 11:48
>To: "ctn-crosscom at icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom at icann.org>"
><ctn-crosscom at icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom at icann.org>>
>Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] UPDATED questionnaire
>
>Dear all,
>
>I erroniously sent out an old version of the questionnaire; please find
>attached the latest and correct version of the questionnaire on 3-letter
>codes.
>
>If you have already comleted the old version, you can simply copy and
>past your answers into this new questionnaire. They are the same
>questions only with one addition, question number 3: 'Three-character
>strings eligible for use as gTLD if not in conflict with ISO 3166 unless
>accompanies by documentation of support or non-objection from the
>relevant government or public authorities¹.
>
>I apologise for the confusion ­ for your convenience I have added the
>text from the original email below. Deadline and all other information
>remains as was.
>
>Very best wishes,
>Lars
>
>
>‹
>Dear all,
>
>As agreed, here is the  questionnaire for 3-letter codes. Please remember
>that this is meant as a feedback gathering exercise. We are looking to
>get as much input from you and your respective SO/ACs or SG/Cs as
>possible to inform our debate on this important ­ and tricky ­ issue.
>
>The deadline for feedback is set for 3 September, feel free to submit any
>feedback to the list before that date as it will provide input for our
>next call(s).
>
>If you have any additional questions/comments, please reach out to either
>Bart or myself and/or raise them on the list.
>Many thanks and very best wishes,
>Lars
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5091 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20150819/f078c0a0/smime.p7s>