[Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

[Alexander Schubert]

Hi,

 

Yes: it must be obviously “three-letter” in the mid of page 1 (“The CWG has interpreted this as comprising:…….. “).

 

I do miss the “short forms” of country and territory names – as the 2012 AGB 2.2.1.4.1  is mentioning them.

I like the final recommendation – but urge to make sure that nobody could misinterpret it in a way that “no policy can ever be created allowing country names & ISO 3166 II codes to be delegated”. THIS WG was unable to find a solution – other policy making groups have to take over (gNSO). 

 

Thanks,

 

Alexander

 

 

From: ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Joke Braeken
Sent: Dienstag, 30. August 2016 16:48
To: ctn-crosscom at icann.org
Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

 

Dear all,

 

As discussed during the latest call on 29 August @21UTC, you are kindly invited to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report.  Please find the latest version in attachment.  

Discussion on the list is more than welcome, but please make changes related to the progress report in the report itself.

 

Deadline: Monday 13 September, end of day.

 

Best regards,

 

 

Joke Braeken

ccNSO Policy Advisor 

 <mailto:joke.braeken at icann.org> joke.braeken at icann.org

 

Follow @ccNSO on Twitter:  <https://twitter.com/ccNSO> https://twitter.com/ccNSO

Follow the ccNSO on Facebook:  <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/> https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/

 <http://ccnso.icann.org> http://ccnso.icann.org 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20160830/d8842097/attachment.html>