[Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

[Timo Võhmar]

Hi Heather

Just to clarify, my proposal was not to remove reference to PDP but to
rephrase that part of the conclusion with two options - new CWG and PDP.
Added my suggestion in the doc.

Best Regards,
Timo Võhmar


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
> I have followed up in answering Annebeth's questions in the comments  and
> have no fundamental objections. On one point I believe we have duplicate
> text in two places so we need to decide where to put it. I've noted that in
> a reply comment. New version attached.
>
>
> I do not agree with Timo's proposal at the end of the document to remove
> the reference in the recommendations section to the charter of the
> Subsequent Procedures PDP. This should not be a controversial statement, as
> the Charter is available and a public document.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Heather Forrest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20160901/d12d6a68/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ProgressReport_postHelsinki_v2.3.1 HF_ABL_SP_2016_09_01.TV HF.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 32193 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20160901/d12d6a68/ProgressReport_postHelsinki_v2.3.1HF_ABL_SP_2016_09_01.TVHF-0001.docx>