[Ctn-crosscom] Second reading suggested change to section 5.1.5 draft final report

[Bart Boswinkel]

Dear all,
Yesterday I pressed the send button to quickly.
To be clear, staff has prepared the final version of the Final Paper (included in redline and as PDF). As you will see, this is the version suggested by Susan. After it has been approved by the co-chairs it will be published on the web page of the WG, and wil be submitted to the chartering organizations.

As no additional comments were received, no additional reading is necessary.  The next call of the CWG is cancelled.

Kind regards,
Bart



From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>
Date: Monday 12 June 2017 at 12:17
To: "ctn-crosscom at icann.org" <ctn-crosscom at icann.org>
Subject: Re: Second reading suggested change to section 5.1.5 draft final report

Dear all,

After last weeks call and the follow-up email staff has not received additional comments nor comments on the proposed changes. As such this concludes the second reading.

Staff will not perpare the Final Paper, and ask the co-chairs to submit the Final Reprot and a cover letter to the chartering organisations. Once the Final paper has been approved by the co-chairs it will be published on the web-page of the WG and you’ll be informed.
Kind regards,
Bart




From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday 6 June 2017 at 13:06
To: "ctn-crosscom at icann.org" <ctn-crosscom at icann.org>
Subject: Second reading suggested change to section 5.1.5 draft final report

Dear all,
Per discussion on this morning on the call please find included the changes suggested by Susan Payne with respect to section of section 5.1.5 of the draft final paper (see her email 5 June 2017 to the list).

On this morning’s call this was accepted by those attending, and it was agreed that if there are no comments on the suggested change by the end of this week (second reading), Friday 9 June 17.00 UTC, staff will prepare the final version of the Final Paper, including the suggested language. The Final Paper will then be submitted by the co-chairs to the chartering organizations (ccNSO and GNSO) and published.

For those of you who were not able to attend today’s call:

  *   All suggested changes were accepted (in second reading)
  *   Editorial changes as suggested were accepted

Thank you, on behalf of staff
Bart Boswinkel



5.1.5        Discussion

Members of the CWG noted that the status quo protects two-character ASCII codes as existing or potential future country code top-level domains. A change in this policy could have a significant impact on the domain name system and members discussed in detail the advantages and disadvantages of potentially altering existing policy guidelines. The competing views advanced by WG members during this debate can be summarized as follows (BB: the original sentence read: The outcome of this debate can be summarized as follows):

Risks that changing the protective status of two-letter codes (in ASCII) might carry:

………

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20170613/949ecaa0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Final PAPER_CWG-UCTN_June  2017 final .pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1575936 bytes
Desc: Final PAPER_CWG-UCTN_June  2017 final .pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20170613/949ecaa0/FinalPAPER_CWG-UCTN_June2017final-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Final PAPER_CWG-UCTN_June  2017 final redline.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 183364 bytes
Desc: Final PAPER_CWG-UCTN_June  2017 final redline.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ctn-crosscom/attachments/20170613/949ecaa0/FinalPAPER_CWG-UCTN_June2017finalredline-0001.docx>