<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px;">Dear all,</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px;">I erroniously sent out an old version of the questionnaire; <b>please find attached the latest and correct version of the questionnaire on 3-letter codes</b>.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div>If you have already comleted the old version, you can simply copy and past your answers into this new questionnaire. They are the same questions only with one addition, question number 3: 'Three-character strings eligible for use as gTLD if not in conflict with ISO 3166 unless accompanies by documentation of support or non-objection from the relevant government or public authorities’.</div><div><br></div><div>I apologise for the confusion – for your convenience I have added the text from the original email below. Deadline and all other information remains as was. </div><div><br></div><div>Very best wishes,</div><div>Lars</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>—</div><div><div>Dear all,</div><div><br></div><div>As agreed, here is the questionnaire for 3-letter codes. Please remember that this is meant as a feedback gathering exercise. We are looking to get as much input from you and your respective SO/ACs or SG/Cs as possible to inform our debate on this important – and tricky – issue. </div><div><br></div><div>The deadline for feedback is set for 3 September, feel free to submit any feedback to the list before that date as it will provide input for our next call(s).</div><div><br></div><div>If you have any additional questions/comments, please reach out to either Bart or myself and/or raise them on the list.</div><div>Many thanks and very best wishes,</div><div>Lars</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>