<div dir="ltr">Thank you very much, Bart, for leading us through the changes in yesterday's call, and for circulating this draft.<div><br></div><div>Let's all make a big push to get this finalised before Johannesburg.</div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,</div><div><br></div><div>Heather</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Bart Boswinkel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org" target="_blank">bart.boswinkel@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="m_28755401203844123WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Dear all,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Following our earlier emails, staff has prepared a draft Final Report.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Following today’s call the proposed way forward is that the CWG will now look at the updates and provide feed-back and comments before the next call, which is scheduled for 6 June 2017, 05.00 UTC. Please share
your comments direct on list or with staff by Thursday 1 June 2017. This will allow staff to consolidate comments received and share it with you well before the meeting.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">As said on today’s call you will see that the suggested way forward is:</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1">
<li class="m_28755401203844123MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Leave the recommendations “as is”. The sense of the CWG that a harmonized framework is not feasible is supported and hence the recommendations that the
CWG should close, but work continue as well. The feed-back received on recommendation C - how to structure future efforts- remains unresolved. Diverse views were submitted, ranging from a GNSO PDP to a ccNSO PDP and everything in between.
</span><u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_28755401203844123MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">The comments that deal with the conclusions pertaining to the use of 2-letters, 3-letters codes and full name of countries and territories as TLD are
also diverse. With respect to these comments staff suggests that these views and opinions included in a summarized version in the report, as an annex. Goal is that the next group, however structured is properly informed about the different views of the community.
</span><u></u><u></u></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Kind regards,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Bart</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ctn-crosscom mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ctn-crosscom@icann.org">Ctn-crosscom@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ctn-crosscom</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>